linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] Kselftest update for Linux 5.4-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <adea75a4-d69e-4241-caf3-84c908871fb6@infradead.org>
Date:   Fri, 20 Sep 2019 09:26:07 -0700
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
        Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Kselftest update for Linux 5.4-rc1

On 9/20/19 9:17 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 12:26 PM Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>
>> This Kselftest update for Linux 5.4-rc1 consists of several fixes to
>> existing tests and adds KUnit, a lightweight unit testing and mocking
>> framework for the Linux kernel from Brendan Higgins.
> 
> So I pulled this, but then I almost immediately unpulled it.
> 
> My reason for doing that may be odd, but it's because of the top-level
> 'kunit' directory. This shouldn't be on the top level.
> 
> The reason I react so strongly is that it actually breaks my finger
> memory. I don't type out filenames - I auto-compete them. So "kernel/"
> is "k<tab>", "drivers/" is "d<tab>" etc.
> 
> It already doesn't work for everything ("mm/" is actually "mm<tab>"
> not because we have files in the git tree, but because the build
> creates various "module" files), but this breaks a common pattern for
> me.
> 
>> In the future KUnit will be linked to Kselftest framework to provide
>> a way to trigger KUnit tests from user-space.
> 
> Can the kernel parts please move to lib/kunit/ or something like that?

Please also move the top-level Kconfig menu item "KUnit support" to
somewhere that is not top-level.  Maybe also in the lib/ menu.  Maybe
in lib/Kconfig.debug.


-- 
~Randy