linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf/core: fixing several typos in comments

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 20 Sep 2019 16:06:56 -0300
From:   Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@...il.com>
To:     Roy Ben Shlomo <royb@...tinelone.com>
Cc:     Roy Ben Shlomo <roy.benshlomo@...il.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/core: fixing several typos in comments

Em Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 08:12:53PM +0300, Roy Ben Shlomo escreveu:
> From: Roy Ben Shlomo <roy.benshlomo@...il.com>

Thanks, applied.

- Arnaldo
 
> Fixing typos in a few functions' documentation comments
> Signed-off-by: Roy Ben Shlomo <royb@...tinelone.com>
> ---
>  kernel/events/core.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
> index 4f08b17d6426..275eae05af20 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> @@ -2239,7 +2239,7 @@ static void __perf_event_disable(struct perf_event *event,
>   *
>   * If event->ctx is a cloned context, callers must make sure that
>   * every task struct that event->ctx->task could possibly point to
> - * remains valid.  This condition is satisifed when called through
> + * remains valid.  This condition is satisfied when called through
>   * perf_event_for_each_child or perf_event_for_each because they
>   * hold the top-level event's child_mutex, so any descendant that
>   * goes to exit will block in perf_event_exit_event().
> @@ -6054,7 +6054,7 @@ static void perf_sample_regs_intr(struct perf_regs *regs_intr,
>   * Get remaining task size from user stack pointer.
>   *
>   * It'd be better to take stack vma map and limit this more
> - * precisly, but there's no way to get it safely under interrupt,
> + * precisely, but there's no way to get it safely under interrupt,
>   * so using TASK_SIZE as limit.
>   */
>  static u64 perf_ustack_task_size(struct pt_regs *regs)
> @@ -6616,7 +6616,7 @@ void perf_prepare_sample(struct perf_event_header *header,
>  
>  	if (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_STACK_USER) {
>  		/*
> -		 * Either we need PERF_SAMPLE_STACK_USER bit to be allways
> +		 * Either we need PERF_SAMPLE_STACK_USER bit to be always
>  		 * processed as the last one or have additional check added
>  		 * in case new sample type is added, because we could eat
>  		 * up the rest of the sample size.
> -- 
> 2.20.1

-- 

- Arnaldo