[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d5e07b37-c295-91d0-30b4-b12065d2d302@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2019 22:15:10 +0200
From: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@...il.com>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>, Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] serdev: Add ACPI devices by ResourceSource field
Hi,
On 9/20/19 10:50 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Also I will give this a test-run on some of the existing devices
> which rely on the instantiation of serdev devices for ACPI
> devices which are childs of the uart device.
Thank you for testing! Will get to your other mail shortly.
> Given the above I think you may want to also limit your patch to
> only instantiate a "struct device" for the first UARTSerialBusV2
> in an ACPI "Device()"'s .
Right, I will change this for a v2 once the issue revealed by your
testing has been resolved.
> I hope this sheds some clarity on the (muddy) situation wrt
> I2cSerialBusV2 handling.
Thank you again, this has definitely helped clear things up for me and
your write-up is much appreciated!
Maximilian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists