[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b2425bd2-38e9-cb9b-4151-94891f3a71d1@huawei.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2019 09:24:17 +0800
From: Hou Tao <houtao1@...wei.com>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>,
Xiaoming Ni <nixiaoming@...wei.com>
CC: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@...nel.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, <dilinger@...ued.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <daniel.santos@...ox.com>,
<linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] jffs2:freely allocate memory when parameters are invalid
Hi Richard,
On 2019/9/20 22:38, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 4:14 PM Xiaoming Ni <nixiaoming@...wei.com> wrote:
>> I still think this is easier to understand:
>> Free the memory allocated by the current function in the failed branch
>
> Please note that jffs2 is in "odd fixes only" maintenance mode.
> Therefore patches like this cannot be processed.
>
> On my never ending review queue are some other jffs2 patches which
> seem to address
> real problems. These go first.
>
> I see that many patches come form Huawei, maybe one of you can help
> maintaining jffs2?
> Reviews, tests, etc.. are very welcome!
>
In Huawei we use jffs2 broadly in our products to support filesystem on raw
NOR flash and NAND flash, so fixing the bugs in jffs2 means a lot to us.
Although I have not read all of jffs2 code thoroughly, I had find and "fixed"
some bugs in jffs2 and I am willing to do any help in the jffs2 community. Maybe
we can start by testing and reviewing the pending patches in patch work ?
Regards,
Tao
Powered by blists - more mailing lists