linux-kernel - [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.2 055/185] sched/fair: Use rq_lock/unlock in online_fair_sched

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190922184924.32534-55-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Sun, 22 Sep 2019 14:47:13 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.2 055/185] sched/fair: Use rq_lock/unlock in online_fair_sched_group

From: Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>

[ Upstream commit a46d14eca7b75fffe35603aa8b81df654353d80f ]

Enabling WARN_DOUBLE_CLOCK in /sys/kernel/debug/sched_features causes
warning to fire in update_rq_clock. This seems to be caused by onlining
a new fair sched group not using the rq lock wrappers.

  [] rq->clock_update_flags & RQCF_UPDATED
  [] WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 54385 at kernel/sched/core.c:210 update_rq_clock+0xec/0x150

  [] Call Trace:
  []  online_fair_sched_group+0x53/0x100
  []  cpu_cgroup_css_online+0x16/0x20
  []  online_css+0x1c/0x60
  []  cgroup_apply_control_enable+0x231/0x3b0
  []  cgroup_mkdir+0x41b/0x530
  []  kernfs_iop_mkdir+0x61/0xa0
  []  vfs_mkdir+0x108/0x1a0
  []  do_mkdirat+0x77/0xe0
  []  do_syscall_64+0x55/0x1d0
  []  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

Using the wrappers in online_fair_sched_group instead of the raw locking
removes this warning.

[ tglx: Use rq_*lock_irq() ]

Signed-off-by: Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190801133749.11033-1-pauld@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index f72bf8122fe4e..5a312c030b8d2 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -10569,18 +10569,18 @@ int alloc_fair_sched_group(struct task_group *tg, struct task_group *parent)
 void online_fair_sched_group(struct task_group *tg)
 {
 	struct sched_entity *se;
+	struct rq_flags rf;
 	struct rq *rq;
 	int i;
 
 	for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
 		rq = cpu_rq(i);
 		se = tg->se[i];
-
-		raw_spin_lock_irq(&rq->lock);
+		rq_lock_irq(rq, &rf);
 		update_rq_clock(rq);
 		attach_entity_cfs_rq(se);
 		sync_throttle(tg, i);
-		raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rq->lock);
+		rq_unlock_irq(rq, &rf);
 	}
 }
 
-- 
2.20.1