linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.3 00/21] 5.3.1-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190922081301.GA2524798@kroah.com>
Date:   Sun, 22 Sep 2019 10:13:01 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-tegra <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.3 00/21] 5.3.1-stable review

On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 05:01:35PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
> 
> On 20/09/2019 15:24, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 02:54:26PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
> >>
> >> On 19/09/2019 23:03, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.3.1 release.
> >>> There are 21 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> >>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> >>> let me know.
> >>>
> >>> Responses should be made by Sat 21 Sep 2019 09:44:25 PM UTC.
> >>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >>>
> >>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >>> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.3.1-rc1.gz
> >>> or in the git tree and branch at:
> >>> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.3.y
> >>> and the diffstat can be found below.
> >>>
> >>> thanks,
> >>>
> >>> greg k-h
> >>
> >> No new regressions* for Tegra ...
> >>
> >> Test results for stable-v5.3:
> >>     12 builds:	12 pass, 0 fail
> >>     22 boots:	22 pass, 0 fail
> >>     38 tests:	37 pass, 1 fail
> >>
> >> Linux version:	5.3.1-rc1-g0aa7f3d6baae
> >> Boards tested:	tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
> >>                 tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra20-ventana,
> >>                 tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra30-cardhu-a04
> >>
> >> * Note we had one regression in v5.3 for a warnings test for Tegra194
> >>   causing the above test failure. This has since been fixed by the
> >>   following commits [0] but given it is just a warning, I have not
> >>   bothered CC'ing for stable.
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >> Jon
> >>
> >> [0] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/8/21/602
> > 
> > I'll be glad to take this in stable for 5.3.y, what is the git commit
> > id?
> 
> OK, that would be great. The IDs are ...
> 
> commit 763719771e84b8c8c2f53af668cdc905faa608de
> Author: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
> Date:   Wed Aug 21 16:02:40 2019 +0100
> 
>     clocksource/drivers/timer-of: Do not warn on deferred probe
> 
> 
> commit 14e019df1e64c8b19ce8e0b3da25b6f40c8716be
> Author: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
> Date:   Wed Aug 21 16:02:41 2019 +0100
> 
>     clocksource/drivers: Do not warn on probe defer
> 
> 

Now queued up, thanks!

greg k-h