[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190922184350.30563-186-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2019 14:43:32 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Nigel Croxon <ncroxon@...hat.com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.3 186/203] raid5: don't increment read_errors on EILSEQ return
From: Nigel Croxon <ncroxon@...hat.com>
[ Upstream commit b76b4715eba0d0ed574f58918b29c1b2f0fa37a8 ]
While MD continues to count read errors returned by the lower layer.
If those errors are -EILSEQ, instead of -EIO, it should NOT increase
the read_errors count.
When RAID6 is set up on dm-integrity target that detects massive
corruption, the leg will be ejected from the array. Even if the
issue is correctable with a sector re-write and the array has
necessary redundancy to correct it.
The leg is ejected because it runs up the rdev->read_errors beyond
conf->max_nr_stripes. The return status in dm-drypt when there is
a data integrity error is -EILSEQ (BLK_STS_PROTECTION).
Signed-off-by: Nigel Croxon <ncroxon@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
drivers/md/raid5.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
index 21514edb2bea3..d574701185db9 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -2526,7 +2526,8 @@ static void raid5_end_read_request(struct bio * bi)
int set_bad = 0;
clear_bit(R5_UPTODATE, &sh->dev[i].flags);
- atomic_inc(&rdev->read_errors);
+ if (!(bi->bi_status == BLK_STS_PROTECTION))
+ atomic_inc(&rdev->read_errors);
if (test_bit(R5_ReadRepl, &sh->dev[i].flags))
pr_warn_ratelimited(
"md/raid:%s: read error on replacement device (sector %llu on %s).\n",
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists