[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190922184924.32534-181-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2019 14:49:19 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Qu Wenruo <wqu@...e.com>, David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.2 181/185] btrfs: delayed-inode: Kill the BUG_ON() in btrfs_delete_delayed_dir_index()
From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@...e.com>
[ Upstream commit 933c22a7512c5c09b1fdc46b557384efe8d03233 ]
There is one report of fuzzed image which leads to BUG_ON() in
btrfs_delete_delayed_dir_index().
Although that fuzzed image can already be addressed by enhanced
extent-tree error handler, it's still better to hunt down more BUG_ON().
This patch will hunt down two BUG_ON()s in
btrfs_delete_delayed_dir_index():
- One for error from btrfs_delayed_item_reserve_metadata()
Instead of BUG_ON(), we output an error message and free the item.
And return the error.
All callers of this function handles the error by aborting current
trasaction.
- One for possible EEXIST from __btrfs_add_delayed_deletion_item()
That function can return -EEXIST.
We already have a good enough error message for that, only need to
clean up the reserved metadata space and allocated item.
To help above cleanup, also modifiy __btrfs_remove_delayed_item() called
in btrfs_release_delayed_item(), to skip unassociated item.
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203253
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@...e.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c | 13 +++++++++++--
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c b/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c
index 43fdb2992956a..6858a05606dd3 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c
@@ -474,6 +474,9 @@ static void __btrfs_remove_delayed_item(struct btrfs_delayed_item *delayed_item)
struct rb_root_cached *root;
struct btrfs_delayed_root *delayed_root;
+ /* Not associated with any delayed_node */
+ if (!delayed_item->delayed_node)
+ return;
delayed_root = delayed_item->delayed_node->root->fs_info->delayed_root;
BUG_ON(!delayed_root);
@@ -1525,7 +1528,12 @@ int btrfs_delete_delayed_dir_index(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
* we have reserved enough space when we start a new transaction,
* so reserving metadata failure is impossible.
*/
- BUG_ON(ret);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ btrfs_err(trans->fs_info,
+"metadata reservation failed for delayed dir item deltiona, should have been reserved");
+ btrfs_release_delayed_item(item);
+ goto end;
+ }
mutex_lock(&node->mutex);
ret = __btrfs_add_delayed_deletion_item(node, item);
@@ -1534,7 +1542,8 @@ int btrfs_delete_delayed_dir_index(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
"err add delayed dir index item(index: %llu) into the deletion tree of the delayed node(root id: %llu, inode id: %llu, errno: %d)",
index, node->root->root_key.objectid,
node->inode_id, ret);
- BUG();
+ btrfs_delayed_item_release_metadata(dir->root, item);
+ btrfs_release_delayed_item(item);
}
mutex_unlock(&node->mutex);
end:
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists