[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72mYYzH1oS4h9GTODMP1ckZn2GnGTGirue1VLU1aw+Qo2A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2019 21:26:21 +0200
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Denis Kirjanov <kda@...ux-powerpc.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.16 000/132] 3.16.74-rc1 review
On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 9:04 PM Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk> wrote:
>
> It looks like this is triggered by you switching arm builds from gcc 8
> to 9, rather than by any code change.
>
> Does it actually make sense to try to support building Linux 3.16 with
> gcc 9? If so, I suppose I'll need to add:
>
> commit edc966de8725f9186cc9358214da89d335f0e0bd
> Author: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
> Date: Fri Aug 2 12:37:56 2019 +0200
>
> Backport minimal compiler_attributes.h to support GCC 9
>
> commit a6e60d84989fa0e91db7f236eda40453b0e44afa
> Author: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
> Date: Sat Jan 19 20:59:34 2019 +0100
>
> include/linux/module.h: copy __init/__exit attrs to init/cleanup_module
Yeah, those should fix it.
Cheers,
Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists