[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190922133805.2cdf2d99@why>
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2019 13:38:05 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@...il.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org (open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED
DEVICE TREE BINDINGS),
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com (open list:BROADCOM BMIPS MIPS
ARCHITECTURE),
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org (open list:BROADCOM BMIPS MIPS ARCHITECTURE)
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] irqchip/irq-bcm7038-l1: Support
brcm,int-fwd-mask
On Fri, 13 Sep 2019 12:15:42 -0700
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com> wrote:
> On some specific chips like 7211 we need to leave some interrupts
> untouched/forwarded to the VPU which is another agent in the system
> making use of that interrupt controller hardware (goes to both ARM GIC
> and VPU L1 interrupt controller). Make that possible by using the
> existing brcm,int-fwd-mask property.
>
> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7038-l1.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7038-l1.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7038-l1.c
> index 0673a44bbdc2..811a34201dd4 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7038-l1.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7038-l1.c
> @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ struct bcm7038_l1_chip {
> struct list_head list;
> u32 wake_mask[MAX_WORDS];
> #endif
> + u32 irq_fwd_mask[MAX_WORDS];
> u8 affinity[MAX_WORDS * IRQS_PER_WORD];
> };
>
> @@ -265,6 +266,7 @@ static int __init bcm7038_l1_init_one(struct device_node *dn,
> resource_size_t sz;
> struct bcm7038_l1_cpu *cpu;
> unsigned int i, n_words, parent_irq;
> + int ret;
>
> if (of_address_to_resource(dn, idx, &res))
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -278,6 +280,14 @@ static int __init bcm7038_l1_init_one(struct device_node *dn,
> else if (intc->n_words != n_words)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> + ret = of_property_read_u32_array(dn , "brcm,int-fwd-mask",
What is the exact meaning of "fwd"? Forward? FirmWare Dementia?
> + intc->irq_fwd_mask, n_words);
> + if (ret != 0 && ret != -EINVAL) {
> + /* property exists but has the wrong number of words */
> + pr_err("invalid brcm,int-fwd-mask property\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> cpu = intc->cpus[idx] = kzalloc(sizeof(*cpu) + n_words * sizeof(u32),
> GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!cpu)
> @@ -288,8 +298,9 @@ static int __init bcm7038_l1_init_one(struct device_node *dn,
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> for (i = 0; i < n_words; i++) {
> - l1_writel(0xffffffff, cpu->map_base + reg_mask_set(intc, i));
> - cpu->mask_cache[i] = 0xffffffff;
> + l1_writel(0xffffffff & ~intc->irq_fwd_mask[i],
> + cpu->map_base + reg_mask_set(intc, i));
> + cpu->mask_cache[i] = 0xffffffff & ~intc->irq_fwd_mask[i];
I seem to remember that (0xffffffff & whatever) == whatever, as long as
'whatever' is a 32bit quantity. So what it this for?
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists