linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] PCI: pciehp: Prevent deadlock on disconnect

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190923082832.GD2773@lahna.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 23 Sep 2019 11:28:32 +0300
From:   Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
Cc:     Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Frederick Lawler <fred@...dlawl.com>,
        "Gustavo A . R . Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
        Sinan Kaya <okaya@...nel.org>,
        Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] PCI: pciehp: Prevent deadlock on disconnect

On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 11:12:42AM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> Regarding suggestion of unbinding PCI drivers without
> pci_lock_rescan_remove() hold, I haven't looked it too closely but I
> think we need to take that lock anyway because when we are unbinding a
> hotplug driver it is supposed to remove the hierarchy below touching the
> shared structures, possibly concurrently. Unfortunately there is no
> documentation what data pci_lock_rescan_remove() actually protects so
> first one needs to understand that. I think one way to clean up this is
> to use finer grained locking (with documented lock ordering) for PCI bus
> structures that can be accessed simultaneusly by different threads. But
> that is not a simple task.

Now that I looked more closely, I realized it actually is not supposed
to remove the hierarchy below so indeed it might be possible to do that
without taking pci_lock_rescan_remove().