linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] usb: hub add filter for device with specific VID&PID

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190923110712.GA2796979@kroah.com>
Date:   Mon, 23 Sep 2019 13:07:12 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Ran Wang <ran.wang_1@....com>
Cc:     Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>,
        Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>,
        Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
        Mathias Payer <mathias.payer@...elwelt.net>,
        Dennis Wassenberg <dennis.wassenberg@...unet.com>,
        "open list:USB SUBSYSTEM" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: hub add filter for device with specific VID&PID

On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 06:51:02PM +0800, Ran Wang wrote:
> USB 2.0 Embedded Host PET Automated Test (CH6) 6.7.23 A-UUT "Unsupported
> Device" Message require to stop enumerating device with VID=0x1a0a PID=0x0201
> and pop message to declare this device is not supported.

Why is this a requirement?

And why those specific vid/pid values?  What do they refer to?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Ran Wang <ran.wang_1@....com>
> ---
>  drivers/usb/core/hub.c | 12 ++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
> index bbcfa63..3cda0da 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
> @@ -4982,6 +4982,18 @@ static void hub_port_connect(struct usb_hub *hub, int port1, u16 portstatus,
>  		if (status < 0)
>  			goto loop;
>  
> +		 /* USB 2.0 Embedded Host PET Automated Test (CH6)
> +		 * 6.7.23 A-UUT "Unsupported Device" Message
> +		 * require to filter out below device when enumeration
> +		 */

Nit, can you align your comment lines, to match the other multi-line
comments in this file?  Otherwise it starts to look bad over time.



> +		if ((udev->descriptor.idVendor == 0x1a0a)
> +		 && (udev->descriptor.idProduct == 0x0201)) {

Are you sure you don't have to convert this value into cpu endian before
checking it?

thanks,

greg k-h