[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKOZuetMK0eRxBrR8wXo_qCaQ7OGKQHqAy15cX437+Q+cvbbvA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 04:31:09 -0700
From: Daniel Colascione <dancol@...gle.com>
To: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
linux-man <linux-man@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: For review: pidfd_send_signal(2) manual page
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 2:12 AM Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
<mtk.manpages@...il.com> wrote:
> The pidfd_send_signal() system call allows the avoidance of race
> conditions that occur when using traditional interfaces (such as
> kill(2)) to signal a process. The problem is that the traditional
> interfaces specify the target process via a process ID (PID), with
> the result that the sender may accidentally send a signal to the
> wrong process if the originally intended target process has termi‐
> nated and its PID has been recycled for another process. By con‐
> trast, a PID file descriptor is a stable reference to a specific
> process; if that process terminates, then the file descriptor
> ceases to be valid
The file *descriptor* remains valid even after the process to which it
refers exits. You can close(2) the file descriptor without getting
EBADF. I'd say, instead, that "a PID file descriptor is a stable
reference to a specific process; process-related operations on a PID
file descriptor fail after that process exits".
Powered by blists - more mailing lists