[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190923164550.GA17765@kozik-lap>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 18:45:50 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Steven Price <steven.price@....com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] drm/panfrost: Reduce the amount of logs on
deferred probe
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 10:36:25AM +0100, Steven Price wrote:
> On 09/09/2019 16:51, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > There is no point to print deferred probe (and its failures to get
> > resources) as an error.
> >
> > In case of multiple probe tries this would pollute the dmesg.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
>
> Looks like a good idea, however from what I can tell you haven't
> completely silenced the 'error' as the return from
> panfrost_regulator_init() will be -EPROBE_DEFER causing another
> dev_err() output:
>
> err = panfrost_regulator_init(pfdev);
> if (err) {
> dev_err(pfdev->dev, "regulator init failed %d\n", err);
> goto err_out0;
> }
>
> Can you fix that up as well? Or indeed drop it altogether since
> panfrost_regulator_init() already outputs an appropriate message.
I'll drop this error message then. Thanks for feedback!
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists