linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 22/36] drm/atmel-hlcdc: use bpp instead of cpp for drm_format

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190923173106.GA13649@ravnborg.org>
Date:   Mon, 23 Sep 2019 19:31:06 +0200
From:   Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To:     Sandy Huang <hjc@...k-chips.com>
Cc:     dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@...nel.org>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/36] drm/atmel-hlcdc: use bpp instead of cpp for
 drm_format_info

Hi Sandy.

Thanks for taking care of this, but...

On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 08:51:45PM +0800, Sandy Huang wrote:
> cpp[BytePerPlane] can't describe the 10bit data format correctly,
> So we use bpp[BitPerPlane] to instead cpp.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sandy Huang <hjc@...k-chips.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_plane.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_plane.c
> index 89f5a75..ab7d423 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_plane.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_plane.c
> @@ -644,7 +644,7 @@ static int atmel_hlcdc_plane_atomic_check(struct drm_plane *p,
>  		int xdiv = i ? fb->format->hsub : 1;
>  		int ydiv = i ? fb->format->vsub : 1;
>  
> -		state->bpp[i] = fb->format->cpp[i];
> +		state->bpp[i] = fb->format->bpp[i] / 8;
>  		if (!state->bpp[i])
>  			return -EINVAL;

Awaiting conclusion on Daniels comment on PATCH 1 and has dropped this
patch for now.
And please address the concerns Rob has about bisectability in your
cover letter for v2.

	Sam