linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/mm/pti: Handle unaligned addr to PMD-mapped page in pti_clone

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHk-=wiRARoL=c0zSJbA9v8n7jqBnxaUyxOPGppoz9M4G+mahw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 23 Sep 2019 11:12:27 -0700
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-team@...com, "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mm/pti: Handle unaligned addr to PMD-mapped page in pti_clone_pgtable

On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 4:28 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> I'm conflicted on this one... the only use of addr here is
> pti_user_pagetable_walk_pmd() and that already masks things, so the
> fixup is 'pointless'.

No it's not.

The *other* use of 'addr' is

        addr += PMD_SIZE;

and then repeat the loop.

And that repeat might then use it for the page-level case the next iteration.

> Also the location is weird; we'd want to do alignment enforcement before
> we commence the for-loop, methinks.

No. See again. The alignment is different for the different cases
inside the loop. Some do per-page stuff, some do per-pmd stuff, and
some do per-pud stuff.

And you don't know which you'll hit a-priori (because it's not limited
to the 'level' testing).

           Linus