linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] Kselftest update for Linux 5.4-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190923194322.GA55255@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 23 Sep 2019 21:43:22 +0200
From:   Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:     Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Kselftest update for Linux 5.4-rc1


* Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:

> I am exploring the possibility to move selftests to a better location 
> or add a git alias so it can be found easily. With the addition of 
> KUnit and future work that is planned to connect kselftest and KUnit, 
> it would make sense have selftests to be in a location that is better 
> suited than where it currently resides.
> 
> I have been getting feedback from some developers that they would like 
> to see selftests more visible and easier to find.
> 
> There are some dependencies (unintended, shouldn't exist) between some 
> tests and content under tools that might pose some logistical problems, 
> in addition to the churn of backporting.
> 
> I haven't explored "git alias" yet though. Since this topic of moving 
> came up, I would liek to get feedback on selftests location in general 
> and where would be a good place for it.

I'm not sure about the Git alias thing - but I do agree that 
tools/testing/selftests is a pretty obscure location given the importance 
of kernel unit tests - and I think it could be moved one level higher, to 
tools/selftests? The "selftest" name already implies the "test" aspect 
after all.

Thanks,

	Ingo