[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <907304d0599684b3caa6773197fd40e09191b48e.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 18:01:54 -0300
From: Leonardo Bras <leonardo@...ux.ibm.com>
To: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Richard Fontana <rfontana@...hat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Ganesh Goudar <ganeshgr@...ux.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Allison Randal <allison@...utok.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/11] mm/gup: Applies counting method to monitor
gup_pgd_range
On Mon, 2019-09-23 at 13:27 -0700, John Hubbard wrote:
> I'd also like a second opinion from the "core" -mm maintainers, but it seems like
> there is now too much code around the gup_pgd_range() call. Especially since there
> are two places where it's called--did you forget the other one in
> __get_user_pages_fast(), btw??
>
Oh, sorry, I missed this one. I will put it on v3.
(Also I will make sure to include linux-mm on v3.)
> Maybe the irq handling and atomic counting should be moved into start/finish
> calls, like this:
>
> start_gup_fast_walk()
> gup_pgd_range()
> finish_gup_fast_walk()
There are cases where interrupt disable/enable is not done around the
lockless pagetable walk.
It may come from functions called above on stack, that's why I opted it
to be only the atomic operation.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists