linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] Smack patches for v5.4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHk-=wgNi_y5SaXGS3hsxsFcU8P89O9ayJZ6yEYkvCC115J40A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 23 Sep 2019 14:38:28 -0700
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
Cc:     Linux Security Module list 
        <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Smack patches for v5.4 - retry

On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 2:35 PM Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 1:14 PM Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com> wrote:
> >
> > Thank for the instruction. I think this is correct.
>
> Looks fine, pulled.

Oh, btw, can you get more signatures on your pgp key? I actually care
more about having a key than having a key with lots of signatures (*),
but signatures and a chain of trust would be good too.

                   Linus

(*) To me, keys are more of a "yeah, I'm the same person that usually
sends these pull requests" than some kind of hard identity.