[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABA=pqeES0C2+7GpAOYuCOqd5DrbZhjS1Tkrxn4kGxXQJkrAfg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 01:26:22 +0300
From: Ivan Kalvachev <ikalvachev@...il.com>
To: Jeremy Sowden <jeremy@...zel.net>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 7 (net/bridge/netfilter/nf_conntrack_bridge.c)
On 8/7/19, Jeremy Sowden <jeremy@...zel.net> wrote:
> On 2019-08-07, at 08:29:44 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 8/7/19 1:36 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > Changes since 20190806:
>>
>> on i386:
>> when CONFIG_NF_TABLES is not set/enabled:
>>
>> CC net/bridge/netfilter/nf_conntrack_bridge.o
>> In file included from
>> ../net/bridge/netfilter/nf_conntrack_bridge.c:21:0:
>> ../include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h: In function
>> ‘nft_gencursor_next’:
>> ../include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h:1224:14: error: ‘const struct
>> net’ has no member named ‘nft’; did you mean ‘nf’?
>> return net->nft.gencursor + 1 == 1 ? 1 : 0;
>> ^~~
>
> I've just posted a series of fixes for netfilter header compilation
> failures, and I think it includes the fix for that:
>
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20190807141705.4864-5-jeremy@azazel.net/T/#u
Have these patches been committed?
I just hit the same bug in linux-5.3.1 release.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists