linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] SafeSetID LSM changes for 5.4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHk-=wh4cuHsE8jFHO7XVatdXa=M2f4RHL3VwnSkAf5UNHUJ-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 23 Sep 2019 17:45:33 -0700
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     James Morris <jamorris@...uxonhyperv.com>
Cc:     Micah Morton <mortonm@...omium.org>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
        Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@....com>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-security-module <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] SafeSetID LSM changes for 5.4

On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 4:35 PM James Morris <jamorris@...uxonhyperv.com> wrote:
>
> My understanding is that SafeSetID is shipping in ChromeOS -- this was
> part of the rationale for merging it.

Well, if even the developer didn't test it for two months, I don't
think "it's in upstream" makes any sense or difference.

                     Linus