lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 24 Sep 2019 07:46:47 +0000
From:   <Tudor.Ambarus@...rochip.com>
To:     <vigneshr@...com>, <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>,
        <marek.vasut@...il.com>, <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <geert+renesas@...der.be>, <jonas@...rbonn.se>
CC:     <dwmw2@...radead.org>, <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
        <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>, <richard@....at>, <joel@....id.au>,
        <andrew@...id.au>, <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, <vz@...ia.com>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, <Tudor.Ambarus@...rochip.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 17/22] mtd: spi-nor: Check all the bits written, not just
 the BP ones

From: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>

Check that all the bits written in the write_sr_and_check() method
match the status_new received value. Failing to write the other bits
is dangerous too, extend the check.

Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>
---
 drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
index 6429c855547e..48bcb2ee1be5 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
@@ -1493,7 +1493,7 @@ static int spi_nor_erase(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct erase_info *instr)
 }
 
 /* Write status register and ensure bits in mask match written values */
-static int write_sr_and_check(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 status_new, u8 mask)
+static int write_sr_and_check(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 status_new)
 {
 	int ret;
 
@@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ static int write_sr_and_check(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 status_new, u8 mask)
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-	return ((nor->bouncebuf[0] & mask) != (status_new & mask)) ? -EIO : 0;
+	return (nor->bouncebuf[0] != status_new) ? -EIO : 0;
 }
 
 static void stm_get_locked_range(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 sr, loff_t *ofs,
@@ -1673,7 +1673,7 @@ static int stm_lock(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)
 	if ((status_new & mask) < (status_old & mask))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	return write_sr_and_check(nor, status_new, mask);
+	return write_sr_and_check(nor, status_new);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1758,7 +1758,7 @@ static int stm_unlock(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)
 	if ((status_new & mask) > (status_old & mask))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	return write_sr_and_check(nor, status_new, mask);
+	return write_sr_and_check(nor, status_new);
 }
 
 /*
-- 
2.9.5

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ