[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <10df14fd-ef26-cac5-1f4d-75546cb93964@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 20:09:05 +0800
From: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, <catalin.marinas@....com>,
<will@...nel.org>, <mingo@...hat.com>, <bp@...en8.de>,
<rth@...ddle.net>, <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
<mattst88@...il.com>, <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
<paulus@...ba.org>, <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
<heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>, <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
<borntraeger@...ibm.com>, <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
<dalias@...c.org>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
<paul.burton@...s.com>, <jhogan@...nel.org>,
<jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>, <chenhc@...ote.com>,
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
<anshuman.khandual@....com>, <tglx@...utronix.de>, <cai@....pw>,
<robin.murphy@....com>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <hpa@...or.com>, <x86@...nel.org>,
<dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, <luto@...nel.org>,
<len.brown@...el.com>, <axboe@...nel.dk>, <dledford@...hat.com>,
<jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>, <linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org>,
<naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, <mwb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
<linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>, <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>, <sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>,
<tbogendoerfer@...e.de>, <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
<rafael@...nel.org>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] numa: make node_to_cpumask_map() NUMA_NO_NODE aware
On 2019/9/24 19:58, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 07:44:28PM +0800, Yunsheng Lin wrote:
>> From [1], there is a lot of devices with node id of NUMA_NO_NODE with the
>> FW_BUG.
>>
>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5a188e2b-6c07-a9db-fbaa-561e9362d3ba@huawei.com/
>
> So aside of all the software devices which we can (and really should)
> fix; these:
>
> 26.470076] pci0000:00: has invalid NUMA node(-1), default node of 0 now selected. Readjust it by writing to sysfs numa_node or contact your vendor for updates.
> 26.815436] pci0000:7b: has invalid NUMA node(-1), default node of 0 now selected. Readjust it by writing to sysfs numa_node or contact your vendor for updates.
> 27.004447] pci0000:7a: has invalid NUMA node(-1), default node of 0 now selected. Readjust it by writing to sysfs numa_node or contact your vendor for updates.
> 27.236797] pci0000:78: has invalid NUMA node(-1), default node of 0 now selected. Readjust it by writing to sysfs numa_node or contact your vendor for updates.
> 27.505833] pci0000:7c: has invalid NUMA node(-1), default node of 0 now selected. Readjust it by writing to sysfs numa_node or contact your vendor for updates.
> 28.056452] pci0000:74: has invalid NUMA node(-1), default node of 0 now selected. Readjust it by writing to sysfs numa_node or contact your vendor for updates.
> 28.470018] pci0000:80: has invalid NUMA node(-1), default node of 0 now selected. Readjust it by writing to sysfs numa_node or contact your vendor for updates.
> 28.726411] pci0000:bb: has invalid NUMA node(-1), default node of 0 now selected. Readjust it by writing to sysfs numa_node or contact your vendor for updates.
> 28.916656] pci0000:ba: has invalid NUMA node(-1), default node of 0 now selected. Readjust it by writing to sysfs numa_node or contact your vendor for updates.
> 29.152839] pci0000:b8: has invalid NUMA node(-1), default node of 0 now selected. Readjust it by writing to sysfs numa_node or contact your vendor for updates.
> 29.425808] pci0000:bc: has invalid NUMA node(-1), default node of 0 now selected. Readjust it by writing to sysfs numa_node or contact your vendor for updates.
> 29.718593] pci0000:b4: has invalid NUMA node(-1), default node of 0 now selected. Readjust it by writing to sysfs numa_node or contact your vendor for updates.
>
> look like actual problems. How can PCI devices not have a node assigned?
The above PCI devices do not have a node assigned because I downgraded
the bios to a older version that has not implemented the "Proximity Domain"
feature specified by APCI, which is optional feature, so the bios denied
that it is a bug of the bios.
>
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists