[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190924135608.GW23050@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 15:56:08 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mm-commits@...r.kernel.org, vdavydov.dev@...il.com,
shakeelb@...gle.com, rientjes@...gle.com, ktkhai@...tuozzo.com,
kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, hughd@...gle.com,
hannes@...xchg.org, cai@....pw, yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: + mm-thp-extract-split_queue_-into-a-struct.patch added to -mm
tree
Do we really need this if deferred list is going to be shrunk more
pro-actively as discussed already - I am sorry I do not have a link handy
but in short the deferred list would be drained from a kworker context
more pro-actively rather than wait for the memory pressure to happen.
On Mon 23-09-19 15:09:02, Andrew Morton wrote:
> ------------------------------------------------------
> From: Yang Shi <yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>
> Subject: mm: thp: extract split_queue_* into a struct
>
> Patch series "Make deferred split shrinker memcg aware", v6.
>
> Currently THP deferred split shrinker is not memcg aware, this may cause
> premature OOM with some configuration. For example the below test would
> run into premature OOM easily:
>
> $ cgcreate -g memory:thp
> $ echo 4G > /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/thp/memory/limit_in_bytes
> $ cgexec -g memory:thp transhuge-stress 4000
>
> transhuge-stress comes from kernel selftest.
>
> It is easy to hit OOM, but there are still a lot THP on the deferred split
> queue, memcg direct reclaim can't touch them since the deferred split
> shrinker is not memcg aware.
>
> Convert deferred split shrinker memcg aware by introducing per memcg
> deferred split queue. The THP should be on either per node or per memcg
> deferred split queue if it belongs to a memcg. When the page is
> immigrated to the other memcg, it will be immigrated to the target memcg's
> deferred split queue too.
>
> Reuse the second tail page's deferred_list for per memcg list since the
> same THP can't be on multiple deferred split queues.
>
> Make deferred split shrinker not depend on memcg kmem since it is not
> slab. It doesn't make sense to not shrink THP even though memcg kmem is
> disabled.
>
> With the above change the test demonstrated above doesn't trigger OOM even
> though with cgroup.memory=nokmem.
>
>
> This patch (of 4):
>
> Put split_queue, split_queue_lock and split_queue_len into a struct in
> order to reduce code duplication when we convert deferred_split to memcg
> aware in the later patches.
>
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1565144277-36240-2-git-send-email-yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com
> Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>
> Suggested-by: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
> Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>
> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
> Cc: Qian Cai <cai@....pw>
> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> ---
>
> include/linux/mmzone.h | 12 +++++++---
> mm/huge_memory.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> mm/page_alloc.c | 8 ++++--
> 3 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h~mm-thp-extract-split_queue_-into-a-struct
> +++ a/include/linux/mmzone.h
> @@ -679,6 +679,14 @@ struct zonelist {
> extern struct page *mem_map;
> #endif
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
> +struct deferred_split {
> + spinlock_t split_queue_lock;
> + struct list_head split_queue;
> + unsigned long split_queue_len;
> +};
> +#endif
> +
> /*
> * On NUMA machines, each NUMA node would have a pg_data_t to describe
> * it's memory layout. On UMA machines there is a single pglist_data which
> @@ -758,9 +766,7 @@ typedef struct pglist_data {
> #endif /* CONFIG_DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT */
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
> - spinlock_t split_queue_lock;
> - struct list_head split_queue;
> - unsigned long split_queue_len;
> + struct deferred_split deferred_split_queue;
> #endif
>
> /* Fields commonly accessed by the page reclaim scanner */
> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c~mm-thp-extract-split_queue_-into-a-struct
> +++ a/mm/huge_memory.c
> @@ -2691,6 +2691,7 @@ int split_huge_page_to_list(struct page
> {
> struct page *head = compound_head(page);
> struct pglist_data *pgdata = NODE_DATA(page_to_nid(head));
> + struct deferred_split *ds_queue = &pgdata->deferred_split_queue;
> struct anon_vma *anon_vma = NULL;
> struct address_space *mapping = NULL;
> int count, mapcount, extra_pins, ret;
> @@ -2777,17 +2778,17 @@ int split_huge_page_to_list(struct page
> }
>
> /* Prevent deferred_split_scan() touching ->_refcount */
> - spin_lock(&pgdata->split_queue_lock);
> + spin_lock(&ds_queue->split_queue_lock);
> count = page_count(head);
> mapcount = total_mapcount(head);
> if (!mapcount && page_ref_freeze(head, 1 + extra_pins)) {
> if (!list_empty(page_deferred_list(head))) {
> - pgdata->split_queue_len--;
> + ds_queue->split_queue_len--;
> list_del(page_deferred_list(head));
> }
> if (mapping)
> __dec_node_page_state(page, NR_SHMEM_THPS);
> - spin_unlock(&pgdata->split_queue_lock);
> + spin_unlock(&ds_queue->split_queue_lock);
> __split_huge_page(page, list, end, flags);
> if (PageSwapCache(head)) {
> swp_entry_t entry = { .val = page_private(head) };
> @@ -2804,7 +2805,7 @@ int split_huge_page_to_list(struct page
> dump_page(page, "total_mapcount(head) > 0");
> BUG();
> }
> - spin_unlock(&pgdata->split_queue_lock);
> + spin_unlock(&ds_queue->split_queue_lock);
> fail: if (mapping)
> xa_unlock(&mapping->i_pages);
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pgdata->lru_lock, flags);
> @@ -2827,52 +2828,56 @@ out:
> void free_transhuge_page(struct page *page)
> {
> struct pglist_data *pgdata = NODE_DATA(page_to_nid(page));
> + struct deferred_split *ds_queue = &pgdata->deferred_split_queue;
> unsigned long flags;
>
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&pgdata->split_queue_lock, flags);
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&ds_queue->split_queue_lock, flags);
> if (!list_empty(page_deferred_list(page))) {
> - pgdata->split_queue_len--;
> + ds_queue->split_queue_len--;
> list_del(page_deferred_list(page));
> }
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pgdata->split_queue_lock, flags);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ds_queue->split_queue_lock, flags);
> free_compound_page(page);
> }
>
> void deferred_split_huge_page(struct page *page)
> {
> struct pglist_data *pgdata = NODE_DATA(page_to_nid(page));
> + struct deferred_split *ds_queue = &pgdata->deferred_split_queue;
> unsigned long flags;
>
> VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageTransHuge(page), page);
>
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&pgdata->split_queue_lock, flags);
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&ds_queue->split_queue_lock, flags);
> if (list_empty(page_deferred_list(page))) {
> count_vm_event(THP_DEFERRED_SPLIT_PAGE);
> - list_add_tail(page_deferred_list(page), &pgdata->split_queue);
> - pgdata->split_queue_len++;
> + list_add_tail(page_deferred_list(page), &ds_queue->split_queue);
> + ds_queue->split_queue_len++;
> }
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pgdata->split_queue_lock, flags);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ds_queue->split_queue_lock, flags);
> }
>
> static unsigned long deferred_split_count(struct shrinker *shrink,
> struct shrink_control *sc)
> {
> struct pglist_data *pgdata = NODE_DATA(sc->nid);
> - return READ_ONCE(pgdata->split_queue_len);
> + struct deferred_split *ds_queue = &pgdata->deferred_split_queue;
> + return READ_ONCE(ds_queue->split_queue_len);
> }
>
> static unsigned long deferred_split_scan(struct shrinker *shrink,
> struct shrink_control *sc)
> {
> struct pglist_data *pgdata = NODE_DATA(sc->nid);
> + struct deferred_split *ds_queue = &pgdata->deferred_split_queue;
> unsigned long flags;
> LIST_HEAD(list), *pos, *next;
> struct page *page;
> int split = 0;
>
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&pgdata->split_queue_lock, flags);
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&ds_queue->split_queue_lock, flags);
> /* Take pin on all head pages to avoid freeing them under us */
> - list_for_each_safe(pos, next, &pgdata->split_queue) {
> + list_for_each_safe(pos, next, &ds_queue->split_queue) {
> page = list_entry((void *)pos, struct page, mapping);
> page = compound_head(page);
> if (get_page_unless_zero(page)) {
> @@ -2880,12 +2885,12 @@ static unsigned long deferred_split_scan
> } else {
> /* We lost race with put_compound_page() */
> list_del_init(page_deferred_list(page));
> - pgdata->split_queue_len--;
> + ds_queue->split_queue_len--;
> }
> if (!--sc->nr_to_scan)
> break;
> }
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pgdata->split_queue_lock, flags);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ds_queue->split_queue_lock, flags);
>
> list_for_each_safe(pos, next, &list) {
> page = list_entry((void *)pos, struct page, mapping);
> @@ -2899,15 +2904,15 @@ next:
> put_page(page);
> }
>
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&pgdata->split_queue_lock, flags);
> - list_splice_tail(&list, &pgdata->split_queue);
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pgdata->split_queue_lock, flags);
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&ds_queue->split_queue_lock, flags);
> + list_splice_tail(&list, &ds_queue->split_queue);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ds_queue->split_queue_lock, flags);
>
> /*
> * Stop shrinker if we didn't split any page, but the queue is empty.
> * This can happen if pages were freed under us.
> */
> - if (!split && list_empty(&pgdata->split_queue))
> + if (!split && list_empty(&ds_queue->split_queue))
> return SHRINK_STOP;
> return split;
> }
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c~mm-thp-extract-split_queue_-into-a-struct
> +++ a/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -6646,9 +6646,11 @@ static unsigned long __init calc_memmap_
> #ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
> static void pgdat_init_split_queue(struct pglist_data *pgdat)
> {
> - spin_lock_init(&pgdat->split_queue_lock);
> - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pgdat->split_queue);
> - pgdat->split_queue_len = 0;
> + struct deferred_split *ds_queue = &pgdat->deferred_split_queue;
> +
> + spin_lock_init(&ds_queue->split_queue_lock);
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ds_queue->split_queue);
> + ds_queue->split_queue_len = 0;
> }
> #else
> static void pgdat_init_split_queue(struct pglist_data *pgdat) {}
> _
>
> Patches currently in -mm which might be from yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com are
>
> mmthp-add-read-only-thp-support-for-non-shmem-fs.patch
> mm-thp-extract-split_queue_-into-a-struct.patch
> mm-move-mem_cgroup_uncharge-out-of-__page_cache_release.patch
> mm-shrinker-make-shrinker-not-depend-on-memcg-kmem.patch
> mm-shrinker-make-shrinker-not-depend-on-memcg-kmem-v6.patch
> mm-thp-make-deferred-split-shrinker-memcg-aware.patch
> mm-thp-make-deferred-split-shrinker-memcg-aware-v6.patch
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists