linux-kernel - Re: NACK: [PATCH] staging: rtl8188eu: remove dead code in do-while conditional step

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190924152515.GD29696@kadam>
Date:   Tue, 24 Sep 2019 18:25:15 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:     Connor Kuehl <connor.kuehl@...onical.com>
Cc:     Larry.Finger@...inger.net, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        straube.linux@...il.com, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: NACK: [PATCH] staging: rtl8188eu: remove dead code in do-while
 conditional step

This email is fine, but I just want to make sure that you don't think
it's required.  We all assumed that you would send a v2.  I sort of hate
the word NACK as well because it sounds like shouting or ducks and those
are my two pet peeves.

Sometimes  people send a v2 patch without any replies to the original
email and we apply the v1 patch that's the only thing to avoid.

regards,
dan carpenter