[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <874l11u30y.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 10:28:45 -0500
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: [Tree, v2] De-clutter the top level directory, move ipc/ => kernel/ipc/, samples/ => Documentation/samples/ and sound/ => drivers/sound/
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> writes:
> - Split it into finer grained steps (3 instead of 2 patches per
> movement), for easier review and bisection testing:
>
> toplevel: Move ipc/ to kernel/ipc/: move the files
> toplevel: Move ipc/ to kernel/ipc/: adjust the build system
> toplevel: Move ipc/ to kernel/ipc/: adjust comments and documentation
Can we not mess with ipc/ please.
I know that will mess with my muscle memory and I don't see the point.
Especially as long as it is named ipc and not sysvipc.
A half cleanup really looks worse than a real cleanup.
SysV IPC really is a side car on the kernel and on unix in general
and having the directory structure reflect that seems completely sensible.
Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists