[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190924160423.GN2369@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 18:04:23 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Giovanni Gherdovich <ggherdovich@...e.cz>
Cc: srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, bp@...e.de, lenb@...nel.org, rjw@...ysocki.net,
x86@...nel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mgorman@...hsingularity.net,
matt@...eblueprint.co.uk, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
juri.lelli@...hat.com, pjt@...gle.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
qperret@...rret.net, dietmar.eggemann@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86,sched: Add support for frequency invariance
On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 04:42:15AM +0200, Giovanni Gherdovich wrote:
> +static void intel_set_cpu_max_freq(void)
> +{
> + /*
> + * TODO: add support for:
> + *
> + * - Xeon Phi (KNM, KNL)
> + * - Xeon Gold/Platinum, Atom Goldmont/Goldmont Plus
> + * - Atom Silvermont
ISTR I had code for Atom.. what happened with that?
> + *
> + * which all now get by default arch_max_freq = SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE
> + */
> + core_set_cpu_max_freq();
> +}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists