Message-Id: <20190924164549.27058-1-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 24 Sep 2019 12:44:40 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
        Shayenne Moura <shayenneluzmoura@...il.com>,
        Rodrigo Siqueira <rodrigosiqueiramelo@...il.com>,
        Haneen Mohammed <hamohammed.sa@...il.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.2 01/70] drm/vkms: Fix crc worker races

From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>

[ Upstream commit 18d0952a838ba559655b0cd9cf85097ad63d9bca ]

The issue we have is that the crc worker might fall behind. We've
tried to handle this by tracking both the earliest frame for which it
still needs to compute a crc, and the last one. Plus when the
crtc_state changes, we have a new work item, which are all run in
order due to the ordered workqueue we allocate for each vkms crtc.

Trouble is there's been a few small issues in the current code:
- we need to capture frame_end in the vblank hrtimer, not in the
  worker. The worker might run much later, and then we generate a lot
  of crc for which there's already a different worker queued up.
- frame number might be 0, so create a new crc_pending boolean to
  track this without confusion.
- we need to atomically grab frame_start/end and clear it, so do that
  all in one go. This is not going to create a new race, because if we
  race with the hrtimer then our work will be re-run.
- only race that can happen is the following:
  1. worker starts
  2. hrtimer runs and updates frame_end
  3. worker grabs frame_start/end, already reading the new frame_end,
  and clears crc_pending
  4. hrtimer calls queue_work()
  5. worker completes
  6. worker gets  re-run, crc_pending is false
  Explain this case a bit better by rewording the comment.

v2: Demote warning level output to debug when we fail to requeue, this
is expected under high load when the crc worker can't quite keep up.

Cc: Shayenne Moura <shayenneluzmoura@...il.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Siqueira <rodrigosiqueiramelo@...il.com>
Cc: Haneen Mohammed <hamohammed.sa@...il.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <rodrigosiqueiramelo@...il.com>
Tested-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <rodrigosiqueiramelo@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <rodrigosiqueiramelo@...il.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190606222751.32567-2-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_crc.c  | 27 +++++++++++++--------------
 drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_crtc.c |  9 +++++++--
 drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_drv.h  |  2 ++
 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_crc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_crc.c
index d7b409a3c0f8c..66603da634fe3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_crc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_crc.c
@@ -166,16 +166,24 @@ void vkms_crc_work_handle(struct work_struct *work)
 	struct drm_plane *plane;
 	u32 crc32 = 0;
 	u64 frame_start, frame_end;
+	bool crc_pending;
 	unsigned long flags;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&out->state_lock, flags);
 	frame_start = crtc_state->frame_start;
 	frame_end = crtc_state->frame_end;
+	crc_pending = crtc_state->crc_pending;
+	crtc_state->frame_start = 0;
+	crtc_state->frame_end = 0;
+	crtc_state->crc_pending = false;
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&out->state_lock, flags);
 
-	/* _vblank_handle() hasn't updated frame_start yet */
-	if (!frame_start || frame_start == frame_end)
-		goto out;
+	/*
+	 * We raced with the vblank hrtimer and previous work already computed
+	 * the crc, nothing to do.
+	 */
+	if (!crc_pending)
+		return;
 
 	drm_for_each_plane(plane, &vdev->drm) {
 		struct vkms_plane_state *vplane_state;
@@ -196,20 +204,11 @@ void vkms_crc_work_handle(struct work_struct *work)
 	if (primary_crc)
 		crc32 = _vkms_get_crc(primary_crc, cursor_crc);
 
-	frame_end = drm_crtc_accurate_vblank_count(crtc);
-
-	/* queue_work can fail to schedule crc_work; add crc for
-	 * missing frames
+	/*
+	 * The worker can fall behind the vblank hrtimer, make sure we catch up.
 	 */
 	while (frame_start <= frame_end)
 		drm_crtc_add_crc_entry(crtc, true, frame_start++, &crc32);
-
-out:
-	/* to avoid using the same value for frame number again */
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&out->state_lock, flags);
-	crtc_state->frame_end = frame_end;
-	crtc_state->frame_start = 0;
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&out->state_lock, flags);
 }
 
 static int vkms_crc_parse_source(const char *src_name, bool *enabled)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_crtc.c
index e447b7588d06e..77a1f5fa5d5c8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_crtc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_crtc.c
@@ -30,13 +30,18 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart vkms_vblank_simulate(struct hrtimer *timer)
 		 * has read the data
 		 */
 		spin_lock(&output->state_lock);
-		if (!state->frame_start)
+		if (!state->crc_pending)
 			state->frame_start = frame;
+		else
+			DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("crc worker falling behind, frame_start: %llu, frame_end: %llu\n",
+					 state->frame_start, frame);
+		state->frame_end = frame;
+		state->crc_pending = true;
 		spin_unlock(&output->state_lock);
 
 		ret = queue_work(output->crc_workq, &state->crc_work);
 		if (!ret)
-			DRM_WARN("failed to queue vkms_crc_work_handle");
+			DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("vkms_crc_work_handle already queued\n");
 	}
 
 	spin_unlock(&output->lock);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_drv.h
index 81f1cfbeb9362..3c7e06b19efd5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_drv.h
@@ -56,6 +56,8 @@ struct vkms_plane_state {
 struct vkms_crtc_state {
 	struct drm_crtc_state base;
 	struct work_struct crc_work;
+
+	bool crc_pending;
 	u64 frame_start;
 	u64 frame_end;
 };
-- 
2.20.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists