linux-kernel - [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.2 38/70] powerpc/perf: fix imc allocation failure handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190924164549.27058-38-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 24 Sep 2019 12:45:17 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
        Anju T Sudhakar <anju@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        "Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.2 38/70] powerpc/perf: fix imc allocation failure handling

From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>

[ Upstream commit 10c4bd7cd28e77aeb8cfa65b23cb3c632ede2a49 ]

The alloc_pages_node return value should be tested for failure
before being passed to page_address.

Tested-by: Anju T Sudhakar <anju@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190724084638.24982-3-npiggin@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 arch/powerpc/perf/imc-pmu.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/imc-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/imc-pmu.c
index 3bdfc1e320964..2231959c56331 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/imc-pmu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/imc-pmu.c
@@ -570,6 +570,7 @@ static int core_imc_mem_init(int cpu, int size)
 {
 	int nid, rc = 0, core_id = (cpu / threads_per_core);
 	struct imc_mem_info *mem_info;
+	struct page *page;
 
 	/*
 	 * alloc_pages_node() will allocate memory for core in the
@@ -580,11 +581,12 @@ static int core_imc_mem_init(int cpu, int size)
 	mem_info->id = core_id;
 
 	/* We need only vbase for core counters */
-	mem_info->vbase = page_address(alloc_pages_node(nid,
-					  GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO | __GFP_THISNODE |
-					  __GFP_NOWARN, get_order(size)));
-	if (!mem_info->vbase)
+	page = alloc_pages_node(nid,
+				GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO | __GFP_THISNODE |
+				__GFP_NOWARN, get_order(size));
+	if (!page)
 		return -ENOMEM;
+	mem_info->vbase = page_address(page);
 
 	/* Init the mutex */
 	core_imc_refc[core_id].id = core_id;
@@ -839,15 +841,17 @@ static int thread_imc_mem_alloc(int cpu_id, int size)
 	int nid = cpu_to_node(cpu_id);
 
 	if (!local_mem) {
+		struct page *page;
 		/*
 		 * This case could happen only once at start, since we dont
 		 * free the memory in cpu offline path.
 		 */
-		local_mem = page_address(alloc_pages_node(nid,
+		page = alloc_pages_node(nid,
 				  GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO | __GFP_THISNODE |
-				  __GFP_NOWARN, get_order(size)));
-		if (!local_mem)
+				  __GFP_NOWARN, get_order(size));
+		if (!page)
 			return -ENOMEM;
+		local_mem = page_address(page);
 
 		per_cpu(thread_imc_mem, cpu_id) = local_mem;
 	}
@@ -1085,11 +1089,14 @@ static int trace_imc_mem_alloc(int cpu_id, int size)
 	int core_id = (cpu_id / threads_per_core);
 
 	if (!local_mem) {
-		local_mem = page_address(alloc_pages_node(phys_id,
-					GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO | __GFP_THISNODE |
-					__GFP_NOWARN, get_order(size)));
-		if (!local_mem)
+		struct page *page;
+
+		page = alloc_pages_node(phys_id,
+				GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO | __GFP_THISNODE |
+				__GFP_NOWARN, get_order(size));
+		if (!page)
 			return -ENOMEM;
+		local_mem = page_address(page);
 		per_cpu(trace_imc_mem, cpu_id) = local_mem;
 
 		/* Initialise the counters for trace mode */
-- 
2.20.1