[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190924185757.GA1538@kunai>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 20:57:57 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To: Ray Jui <ray.jui@...adcom.com>
Cc: Rayagonda Kokatanur <rayagonda.kokatanur@...adcom.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Lori Hikichi <lori.hikichi@...adcom.com>,
Icarus Chau <icarus.chau@...adcom.com>,
Shivaraj Shetty <sshetty1@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] i2c: iproc: Add i2c repeated start capability
> In my opinion, it's probably better to continue to support master_xfer in
> our driver (with obvious limitations), in order to allow i2ctransfer (or any
> apps that use I2C RDWR) to continue to work.
>
> What do you think?
Yes, don't break it for users. We should have paid more attention to it
in the beginning. But, while not ideal, it is not such a big deal to
keep it like this.
Thanks for your investigations!
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists