[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190925014453.20236-1-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 09:44:53 +0800
From: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@...ux.intel.com>
To: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Wei Yang <richardw.yang@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] x86/mm: fix function name typo in pmd_read_atomic() comment
The function involved should be pte_offset_map_lock and we never have
function pmd_offset_map_lock defined.
Fixes: 26c191788f18 ("mm: pmd_read_atomic: fix 32bit PAE pmd walk vs pmd_populate SMP race conditio")
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@...ux.intel.com>
---
Hope my understanding is correct.
---
arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable-3level.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable-3level.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable-3level.h
index e3633795fb22..45e6099fe6b7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable-3level.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable-3level.h
@@ -44,10 +44,10 @@ static inline void native_set_pte(pte_t *ptep, pte_t pte)
* pmd_populate rightfully does a set_64bit, but if we're reading the
* pmd_t with a "*pmdp" on the mincore side, a SMP race can happen
* because gcc will not read the 64bit of the pmd atomically. To fix
- * this all places running pmd_offset_map_lock() while holding the
+ * this all places running pte_offset_map_lock() while holding the
* mmap_sem in read mode, shall read the pmdp pointer using this
* function to know if the pmd is null nor not, and in turn to know if
- * they can run pmd_offset_map_lock or pmd_trans_huge or other pmd
+ * they can run pte_offset_map_lock or pmd_trans_huge or other pmd
* operations.
*
* Without THP if the mmap_sem is hold for reading, the pmd can only
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists