lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 25 Sep 2019 09:37:41 -0500
From:   Benoit Parrot <bparrot@...com>
To:     Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
CC:     Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
        Prabhakar Lad <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch v3 6/8] media: i2c: ov2659: Add powerdown/reset gpio
 handling

Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com> wrote on Wed [2019-Sep-25 12:51:54 +0300]:
> Hi Benoit,
> 
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 11:44:12AM -0500, Benoit Parrot wrote:
> > On some board it is possible that the sensor 'powerdown' and or 'reset'
> > pin might be controlled by gpio instead of being tied.
> > 
> > To implement we add pm_runtime support which will handle the power
> > up/down sequence when it is available otherwise the sensor will be
> > powered on at module insertion/probe and powered off at module removal.
> > 
> > Now originally the driver assumed that the sensor would always stay
> > powered and keep its register setting. We cannot assume this anymore, so
> > every time we "power up" we need to re-program the initial registers
> > configuration first. This was previously done only at probe time.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Benoit Parrot <bparrot@...com>
> 
> Thanks for the update.
> 
> I missed the control interface is accessible also when the device is not
> streaming, and the driver doesn't appear to power on the sensor for that,
> leading to a failing I²C write.
> 
> Could you address that as well, either here or as a separate patch? E.g.
> the smiapp driver does this.

Yes, I missed that also.
I'll add a check in .s_ctrl().

Benoit

> 
> -- 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Sakari Ailus
> sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ