[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOrgDVNraVQT7kLvPJ36OZM8tQ5atfvy7TYG+JCw9XXwzb1HBQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 01:41:12 +0200
From: Dávid Bolvanský <david.bolvansky@...il.com>
To: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: Fix clang -Wint-in-bool-context warnings in
IF_ASSIGN macro
GCC C frontend does not warn, GCC C++ FE does. https://godbolt.org/z/_sczyM
So I (we?) think there is something weird in gcc frontends.
>> I can't think of a case that this warning is a bug (maybe David can
explain more),
In this case or generally? General bug example:
if (state == A || B)
(should be if (state == A || state == B))
Since this is just one occurrence and I recommend to just land this small fix.
st 25. 9. 2019 o 19:41 Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com> napísal(a):
>
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 10:29 AM Nathan Chancellor
> <natechancellor@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > After r372664 in clang, the IF_ASSIGN macro causes a couple hundred
> > warnings along the lines of:
> >
> > kernel/trace/trace_output.c:1331:2: warning: converting the enum
> > constant to a boolean [-Wint-in-bool-context]
> > kernel/trace/trace.h:409:3: note: expanded from macro
> > 'trace_assign_type'
> > IF_ASSIGN(var, ent, struct ftrace_graph_ret_entry,
> > ^
> > kernel/trace/trace.h:371:14: note: expanded from macro 'IF_ASSIGN'
> > WARN_ON(id && (entry)->type != id); \
> > ^
> > 264 warnings generated.
> >
> > Add the implicit '!= 0' to the WARN_ON statement to fix the warnings.
> >
> > Link: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/28b38c277a2941e9e891b2db30652cfd962f070b
> > Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/686
> > Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
>
> I can't think of a case that this warning is a bug (maybe David can
> explain more), but seems like a small fix that can stop a big spew of
> warnings, and IIUC this is the lone instance we see in the kernel. In
> that case, I prefer a tiny change to outright disabling the warning in
> case it does find interesting cases later.
> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
>
> > ---
> > kernel/trace/trace.h | 10 +++++-----
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.h b/kernel/trace/trace.h
> > index 26b0a08f3c7d..f801d154ff6a 100644
> > --- a/kernel/trace/trace.h
> > +++ b/kernel/trace/trace.h
> > @@ -365,11 +365,11 @@ static inline struct trace_array *top_trace_array(void)
> > __builtin_types_compatible_p(typeof(var), type *)
> >
> > #undef IF_ASSIGN
> > -#define IF_ASSIGN(var, entry, etype, id) \
> > - if (FTRACE_CMP_TYPE(var, etype)) { \
> > - var = (typeof(var))(entry); \
> > - WARN_ON(id && (entry)->type != id); \
> > - break; \
> > +#define IF_ASSIGN(var, entry, etype, id) \
> > + if (FTRACE_CMP_TYPE(var, etype)) { \
> > + var = (typeof(var))(entry); \
> > + WARN_ON(id != 0 && (entry)->type != id); \
> > + break; \
> > }
> >
> > /* Will cause compile errors if type is not found. */
> > --
> > 2.23.0
> >
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
> ~Nick Desaulniers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists