linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCHv2 1/3] dt-bindings: misc: Add dt bindings for flex noc Performance Monitor

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 26 Sep 2019 07:29:59 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Shubhrajyoti Datta <shubhrajyoti.datta@...inx.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, arnd@...db.de, michal.simek@...inx.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCHv2 1/3] dt-bindings: misc: Add dt bindings for flex
 noc Performance Monitor

On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 10:46:24AM +0530, Shubhrajyoti Datta wrote:
> Add dt bindings for flexnoc Performance Monitor.
> The flexnoc counters for read and write response and requests are
> supported.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti Datta <shubhrajyoti.datta@...inx.com>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/misc/xlnx,flexnoc.txt      | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/xlnx,flexnoc.txt

<snip>

Why are these "RFC"?

I guess you don't want them merged because you are not thinking that
they are good enough?  What needs to be done on them that you are
sending them out now?

greg k-h