lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 26 Sep 2019 09:47:18 +0200
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To:     Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
Cc:     Alastair D'Silva <alastair@....ibm.com>, alastair@...ilva.org,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] memory_hotplug: Add a bounds check to __add_pages

On Thu 26-09-19 09:40:05, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 11:34:05AM +1000, Alastair D'Silva wrote:
> > From: Alastair D'Silva <alastair@...ilva.org>
> > @@ -291,6 +307,10 @@ int __ref __add_pages(int nid, unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
> >  	unsigned long nr, start_sec, end_sec;
> >  	struct vmem_altmap *altmap = restrictions->altmap;
> >  
> > +	err = check_hotplug_memory_addressable(pfn, nr_pages);
> > +	if (err)
> > +		return err;
> > +
> 
> I am probably off here because 1) I am jumping blind in a middle of a discussion and
> 2) I got back from holydays yesterday, so bear with me.
> 
> Would not be better to just place the check in add_memory_resource instead?

This was the previous version of the patch. The argument is that we do
not want each add_pages user to think of this special handling.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ