[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DB7PR08MB3082A688BDDD95F179EA388EF7860@DB7PR08MB3082.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 09:23:18 +0000
From: "Justin He (Arm Technology China)" <Justin.He@....com>
To: Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>
CC: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@....com>,
James Morse <James.Morse@....com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Suzuki Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@....com>,
Punit Agrawal <punitagrawal@...il.com>,
Anshuman Khandual <Anshuman.Khandual@....com>,
Alex Van Brunt <avanbrunt@...dia.com>,
Robin Murphy <Robin.Murphy@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@...dia.com>,
"hejianet@...il.com" <hejianet@...il.com>,
"Kaly Xin (Arm Technology China)" <Kaly.Xin@....com>,
nd <nd@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v9 1/3] arm64: cpufeature: introduce helper
cpu_has_hw_af()
Hi Catalin
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
> Sent: 2019年9月25日 22:38
> To: Justin He (Arm Technology China) <Justin.He@....com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>; Mark Rutland
> <Mark.Rutland@....com>; James Morse <James.Morse@....com>; Marc
> Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>; Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>; Kirill A.
> Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>; linux-arm-
> kernel@...ts.infradead.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> mm@...ck.org; Suzuki Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@....com>; Punit
> Agrawal <punitagrawal@...il.com>; Anshuman Khandual
> <Anshuman.Khandual@....com>; Alex Van Brunt
> <avanbrunt@...dia.com>; Robin Murphy <Robin.Murphy@....com>;
> Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>; Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-
> foundation.org>; Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>; Ralph Campbell
> <rcampbell@...dia.com>; hejianet@...il.com; Kaly Xin (Arm Technology
> China) <Kaly.Xin@....com>; nd <nd@....com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/3] arm64: cpufeature: introduce helper
> cpu_has_hw_af()
>
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 10:59:20AM +0800, Jia He wrote:
> > We unconditionally set the HW_AFDBM capability and only enable it on
> > CPUs which really have the feature. But sometimes we need to know
> > whether this cpu has the capability of HW AF. So decouple AF from
> > DBM by new helper cpu_has_hw_af().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jia He <justin.he@....com>
> > Suggested-by: Suzuki Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@....com>
> > Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
>
> Which bug did the kbuild robot actually report? I'd drop this line.
>
This line is added due to [1]:
"If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>"
Yes, I know your concern, it is a little bit confusing. But I don't know
how to distinguish the case btw a) original bug report b) bug report
of my patch implementation? Thanks for any suggestion.
[1] https://www.lkml.org/lkml/2019/9/18/940
--
Cheers,
Justin (Jia He)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists