linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] KVM: X86: Fix userspace set invalid CR4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 26 Sep 2019 12:29:23 +0200
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] KVM: X86: Fix userspace set invalid CR4

On 18/09/19 11:50, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> From: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>
> 
> Reported by syzkaller:
> 
> 	WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 6544 at /home/kernel/data/kvm/arch/x86/kvm//vmx/vmx.c:4689 handle_desc+0x37/0x40 [kvm_intel]
> 	CPU: 0 PID: 6544 Comm: a.out Tainted: G           OE     5.3.0-rc4+ #4
> 	RIP: 0010:handle_desc+0x37/0x40 [kvm_intel]
> 	Call Trace:
> 	 vmx_handle_exit+0xbe/0x6b0 [kvm_intel]
> 	 vcpu_enter_guest+0x4dc/0x18d0 [kvm]
> 	 kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x407/0x660 [kvm]
> 	 kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x3ad/0x690 [kvm]
> 	 do_vfs_ioctl+0xa2/0x690
> 	 ksys_ioctl+0x6d/0x80
> 	 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x1a/0x20
> 	 do_syscall_64+0x74/0x720
> 	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
> 
> When CR4.UMIP is set, guest should have UMIP cpuid flag. Current
> kvm set_sregs function doesn't have such check when userspace inputs
> sregs values. SECONDARY_EXEC_DESC is enabled on writes to CR4.UMIP
> in vmx_set_cr4 though guest doesn't have UMIP cpuid flag. The testcast
> triggers handle_desc warning when executing ltr instruction since
> guest architectural CR4 doesn't set UMIP. This patch fixes it by
> adding valid CR4 and CPUID combination checking in __set_sregs.
> 
> syzkaller source: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=138efb99600000
> 
> Reported-by: syzbot+0f1819555fbdce992df9@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index f7cfd8e..d23cf0d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -884,34 +884,42 @@ int kvm_set_xcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 index, u64 xcr)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_set_xcr);
>  
> -int kvm_set_cr4(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cr4)
> +static int kvm_valid_cr4(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cr4)
>  {
> -	unsigned long old_cr4 = kvm_read_cr4(vcpu);
> -	unsigned long pdptr_bits = X86_CR4_PGE | X86_CR4_PSE | X86_CR4_PAE |
> -				   X86_CR4_SMEP | X86_CR4_SMAP | X86_CR4_PKE;
> -
>  	if (cr4 & CR4_RESERVED_BITS)
> -		return 1;
> +		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	if (!guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_XSAVE) && (cr4 & X86_CR4_OSXSAVE))
> -		return 1;
> +		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	if (!guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_SMEP) && (cr4 & X86_CR4_SMEP))
> -		return 1;
> +		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	if (!guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_SMAP) && (cr4 & X86_CR4_SMAP))
> -		return 1;
> +		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	if (!guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_FSGSBASE) && (cr4 & X86_CR4_FSGSBASE))
> -		return 1;
> +		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	if (!guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_PKU) && (cr4 & X86_CR4_PKE))
> -		return 1;
> +		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	if (!guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_LA57) && (cr4 & X86_CR4_LA57))
> -		return 1;
> +		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	if (!guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_UMIP) && (cr4 & X86_CR4_UMIP))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int kvm_set_cr4(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cr4)
> +{
> +	unsigned long old_cr4 = kvm_read_cr4(vcpu);
> +	unsigned long pdptr_bits = X86_CR4_PGE | X86_CR4_PSE | X86_CR4_PAE |
> +				   X86_CR4_SMEP | X86_CR4_SMAP | X86_CR4_PKE;
> +
> +	if (kvm_valid_cr4(vcpu, cr4))
>  		return 1;
>  
>  	if (is_long_mode(vcpu)) {
> @@ -8641,10 +8649,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_task_switch);
>  
>  static int kvm_valid_sregs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_sregs *sregs)
>  {
> -	if (!guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_XSAVE) &&
> -			(sregs->cr4 & X86_CR4_OSXSAVE))
> -		return  -EINVAL;
> -
>  	if ((sregs->efer & EFER_LME) && (sregs->cr0 & X86_CR0_PG)) {
>  		/*
>  		 * When EFER.LME and CR0.PG are set, the processor is in
> @@ -8663,7 +8667,7 @@ static int kvm_valid_sregs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_sregs *sregs)
>  			return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> -	return 0;
> +	return kvm_valid_cr4(vcpu, sregs->cr4);
>  }
>  
>  static int __set_sregs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_sregs *sregs)
> 

Queued, thanks.

Paolo