[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190926151752.GU2036@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 08:17:52 -0700
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Lukasz Majewski <lukma@...x.de>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: spi: Add call to spi_slave_abort() function when spidev driver
is released
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 04:06:45PM +0200, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 2:49 PM Lukasz Majewski <lukma@...x.de> wrote:
> > > The question is if we shall call the spi_slave_abort() when
> > > cleaning up spi after releasing last reference, or each time
> > > release callback is called ?
> > TBH, I don't know. Is it realistic that there are multiple opens?
> I'm using on my setup only one test program to use /dev/spidevX.Y and
> /dev/spidevA.B (loopback with wired connection).
> However, you also shall be able to connect via ssh and run the same
> setup in parallel...
It doesn't seem entirely realistic, but I can imagine cases like
fork()/exec() where we end up with two copies of the file open
but end up immediately closing one.
> > That means the abort is called only for the last user.
> > And only if the underlying device still exists. Which means that if
> > it has disappeared (how can that happen? spidev unbind?),
> In my case, I just disconnect some SPI signals and the test program
> just hangs. I do need to ctrl+c to stop it (or use timeout).
> From my debugging the .release callback is called each time the program
> is aborted (either with ctrl+c or timeout).
Should be on file close IIRC.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists