[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AADFC41AFE54684AB9EE6CBC0274A5D19D590FE4@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 00:48:32 +0000
From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-s390@...r.kernel.org" <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org" <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"intel-gvt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gvt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"kwankhede@...dia.com" <kwankhede@...dia.com>,
"alex.williamson@...hat.com" <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
"mst@...hat.com" <mst@...hat.com>,
"Bie, Tiwei" <tiwei.bie@...el.com>
CC: "christophe.de.dinechin@...il.com" <christophe.de.dinechin@...il.com>,
"sebott@...ux.ibm.com" <sebott@...ux.ibm.com>,
"airlied@...ux.ie" <airlied@...ux.ie>,
"joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com" <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
"heiko.carstens@...ibm.com" <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
"virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"rob.miller@...adcom.com" <rob.miller@...adcom.com>,
"lulu@...hat.com" <lulu@...hat.com>,
"eperezma@...hat.com" <eperezma@...hat.com>,
"pasic@...ux.ibm.com" <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>,
"borntraeger@...ibm.com" <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
"haotian.wang@...ive.com" <haotian.wang@...ive.com>,
"Wang, Zhi A" <zhi.a.wang@...el.com>,
"farman@...ux.ibm.com" <farman@...ux.ibm.com>,
"idos@...lanox.com" <idos@...lanox.com>,
"gor@...ux.ibm.com" <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Liang, Cunming" <cunming.liang@...el.com>,
"zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com" <zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com>,
"Vivi, Rodrigo" <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
"Wang, Xiao W" <xiao.w.wang@...el.com>,
"freude@...ux.ibm.com" <freude@...ux.ibm.com>,
"jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com" <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
"parav@...lanox.com" <parav@...lanox.com>,
"Wang, Zhihong" <zhihong.wang@...el.com>,
"akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com" <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"cohuck@...hat.com" <cohuck@...hat.com>,
"oberpar@...ux.ibm.com" <oberpar@...ux.ibm.com>,
"maxime.coquelin@...hat.com" <maxime.coquelin@...hat.com>,
"daniel@...ll.ch" <daniel@...ll.ch>,
"Zhu, Lingshan" <lingshan.zhu@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V2 6/8] mdev: introduce virtio device and its device ops
> From: Jason Wang
> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2019 8:45 PM
>
>
> On 2019/9/25 下午5:09, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> >> From: Jason Wang [mailto:jasowang@...hat.com]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2019 9:54 PM
> >>
> >> This patch implements basic support for mdev driver that supports
> >> virtio transport for kernel virtio driver.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
> >> ---
> >> include/linux/mdev.h | 2 +
> >> include/linux/virtio_mdev.h | 145
> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> 2 files changed, 147 insertions(+)
> >> create mode 100644 include/linux/virtio_mdev.h
> >>
> >> diff --git a/include/linux/mdev.h b/include/linux/mdev.h
> >> index 3414307311f1..73ac27b3b868 100644
> >> --- a/include/linux/mdev.h
> >> +++ b/include/linux/mdev.h
> >> @@ -126,6 +126,8 @@ struct mdev_device *mdev_from_dev(struct
> device
> >> *dev);
> >>
> >> enum {
> >> MDEV_ID_VFIO = 1,
> >> + MDEV_ID_VIRTIO = 2,
> >> + MDEV_ID_VHOST = 3,
> >> /* New entries must be added here */
> >> };
> >>
> >> diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_mdev.h b/include/linux/virtio_mdev.h
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 000000000000..d1a40a739266
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/include/linux/virtio_mdev.h
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,145 @@
> >> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> >> +/*
> >> + * Virtio mediated device driver
> >> + *
> >> + * Copyright 2019, Red Hat Corp.
> >> + * Author: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
> >> + */
> >> +#ifndef _LINUX_VIRTIO_MDEV_H
> >> +#define _LINUX_VIRTIO_MDEV_H
> >> +
> >> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> >> +#include <linux/mdev.h>
> >> +#include <uapi/linux/vhost.h>
> >> +
> >> +#define VIRTIO_MDEV_DEVICE_API_STRING "virtio-
> mdev"
> >> +#define VIRTIO_MDEV_VERSION 0x1
> > Just be curious. is this version identical to virtio spec version that below
> > callbacks are created for, or just irrelevant?
>
>
> It could be a hint but basically it's a way for userspace driver
> compatibility. For kernel we don't need this.
>
>
> >
> >> +
> >> +struct virtio_mdev_callback {
> >> + irqreturn_t (*callback)(void *data);
> >> + void *private;
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +/**
> >> + * struct vfio_mdev_device_ops - Structure to be registered for each
> >> + * mdev device to register the device to virtio-mdev module.
> >> + *
> >> + * @set_vq_address: Set the address of virtqueue
> >> + * @mdev: mediated device
> >> + * @idx: virtqueue index
> >> + * @desc_area: address of desc area
> >> + * @driver_area: address of driver area
> >> + * @device_area: address of device area
> >> + * Returns integer: success (0) or error (< 0)
> >> + * @set_vq_num: Set the size of virtqueue
> >> + * @mdev: mediated device
> >> + * @idx: virtqueue index
> >> + * @num: the size of virtqueue
> >> + * @kick_vq: Kick the virtqueue
> >> + * @mdev: mediated device
> >> + * @idx: virtqueue index
> >> + * @set_vq_cb: Set the interrut calback function for
> >> + * a virtqueue
> >> + * @mdev: mediated device
> >> + * @idx: virtqueue index
> >> + * @cb: virtio-mdev interrupt callback
> >> structure
> >> + * @set_vq_ready: Set ready status for a virtqueue
> >> + * @mdev: mediated device
> >> + * @idx: virtqueue index
> >> + * @ready: ready (true) not ready(false)
> >> + * @get_vq_ready: Get ready status for a virtqueue
> >> + * @mdev: mediated device
> >> + * @idx: virtqueue index
> >> + * Returns boolean: ready (true) or not (false)
> >> + * @set_vq_state: Set the state for a virtqueue
> >> + * @mdev: mediated device
> >> + * @idx: virtqueue index
> >> + * @state: virtqueue state (last_avail_idx)
> >> + * Returns integer: success (0) or error (< 0)
> >> + * @get_vq_state: Get the state for a virtqueue
> >> + * @mdev: mediated device
> >> + * @idx: virtqueue index
> >> + * Returns virtqueue state (last_avail_idx)
> >> + * @get_vq_align: Get the virtqueue align requirement
> >> + * for the device
> >> + * @mdev: mediated device
> >> + * Returns virtqueue algin requirement
> >> + * @get_features: Get virtio features supported by the device
> >> + * @mdev: mediated device
> >> + * Returns the features support by the
> >> + * device
> >> + * @get_features: Set virtio features supported by the driver
> >> + * @mdev: mediated device
> >> + * @features: feature support by the driver
> >> + * Returns integer: success (0) or error (< 0)
> >> + * @set_config_cb: Set the config interrupt callback
> >> + * @mdev: mediated device
> >> + * @cb: virtio-mdev interrupt callback
> >> structure
> >> + * @get_device_id: Get virtio device id
> >> + * @mdev: mediated device
> >> + * Returns u32: virtio device id
> >> + * @get_vendor_id: Get virtio vendor id
> >> + * @mdev: mediated device
> >> + * Returns u32: virtio vendor id
> >> + * @get_status: Get the device status
> >> + * @mdev: mediated device
> >> + * Returns u8: virtio device status
> >> + * @set_status: Set the device status
> >> + * @mdev: mediated device
> >> + * @status: virtio device status
> >> + * @get_config: Read from device specific confiugration
> >> space
> > configuration (and similar typos downward)
>
>
> Let me fix.
>
>
> >
> >> + * @mdev: mediated device
> >> + * @offset: offset from the beginning of
> >> + * configuration space
> >> + * @buf: buffer used to read to
> >> + * @len: the length to read from
> >> + * configration space
> >> + * @set_config: Write to device specific confiugration space
> >> + * @mdev: mediated device
> >> + * @offset: offset from the beginning of
> >> + * configuration space
> >> + * @buf: buffer used to write from
> >> + * @len: the length to write to
> >> + * configration space
> >> + * @get_version: Get the version of virtio mdev device
> >> + * @mdev: mediated device
> >> + * Returns integer: version of the device
> >> + * @get_generation: Get device generaton
> >> + * @mdev: mediated device
> >> + * Returns u32: device generation
> >> + */
> >> +struct virtio_mdev_device_ops {
> >> + /* Virtqueue ops */
> >> + int (*set_vq_address)(struct mdev_device *mdev,
> >> + u16 idx, u64 desc_area, u64 driver_area,
> >> + u64 device_area);
> >> + void (*set_vq_num)(struct mdev_device *mdev, u16 idx, u32 num);
> >> + void (*kick_vq)(struct mdev_device *mdev, u16 idx);
> >> + void (*set_vq_cb)(struct mdev_device *mdev, u16 idx,
> >> + struct virtio_mdev_callback *cb);
> >> + void (*set_vq_ready)(struct mdev_device *mdev, u16 idx, bool
> >> ready);
> >> + bool (*get_vq_ready)(struct mdev_device *mdev, u16 idx);
> >> + int (*set_vq_state)(struct mdev_device *mdev, u16 idx, u64 state);
> >> + u64 (*get_vq_state)(struct mdev_device *mdev, u16 idx);
> >> +
> >> + /* Device ops */
> >> + u16 (*get_vq_align)(struct mdev_device *mdev);
> >> + u64 (*get_features)(struct mdev_device *mdev);
> >> + int (*set_features)(struct mdev_device *mdev, u64 features);
> >> + void (*set_config_cb)(struct mdev_device *mdev,
> >> + struct virtio_mdev_callback *cb);
> >> + u16 (*get_queue_max)(struct mdev_device *mdev);
> >> + u32 (*get_device_id)(struct mdev_device *mdev);
> >> + u32 (*get_vendor_id)(struct mdev_device *mdev);
> >> + u8 (*get_status)(struct mdev_device *mdev);
> >> + void (*set_status)(struct mdev_device *mdev, u8 status);
> >> + void (*get_config)(struct mdev_device *mdev, unsigned int offset,
> >> + void *buf, unsigned int len);
> >> + void (*set_config)(struct mdev_device *mdev, unsigned int offset,
> >> + const void *buf, unsigned int len);
> >> + int (*get_version)(struct mdev_device *mdev);
> >> + u32 (*get_generation)(struct mdev_device *mdev);
> >> +};
> > I'm not sure how stable above ops are.
>
>
> It's the kernel internal API, so there's no strict requirement for this.
> We will export a version value for userspace for compatibility.
>
>
> > Does it make sense if defining
> > just two callbacks here, e.g. vq_ctrl and device_ctrl, and then let the
> > vendor driver to handle specific ops in each category (similar to how
> > ioctl works)?
>
>
> My understanding is that it introduce another indirection, you still
> need to differ from different command, and it's less flexible than
> direct callback.
>
> What's the value of doing this?
>
I just thought doing so may provide better compatibility to the
parent driver. Even when new op is introduced, a parent driver
that was developed against the old set can still be loaded in the
new kernel. It just returns error when unrecognized ops are
routed through vq_ctrl and device_ctrl, if the userspace doesn't
favor the exposed version value. But if above ops set is pretty
stable, then this comment can be ignored.
Thanks
Kevin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists