[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190926203755.GA142676@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 13:37:56 -0700
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
To: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
Cc: jaegeuk@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix to avoid data corruption by
forbidding SSR overwrite
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 11:03:34AM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> There is one case can cause data corruption.
>
> - write 4k to fileA
> - fsync fileA, 4k data is writebacked to lbaA
> - write 4k to fileA
> - kworker flushs 4k to lbaB; dnode contain lbaB didn't be persisted yet
> - write 4k to fileB
> - kworker flush 4k to lbaA due to SSR
> - SPOR -> dnode with lbaA will be recovered, however lbaA contains fileB's
> data
>
> One solution is tracking all fsynced file's block history, and disallow
> SSR overwrite on newly invalidated block on that file.
>
> However, during recovery, no matter the dnode is flushed or fsynced, all
> previous dnodes until last fsynced one in node chain can be recovered,
> that means we need to record all block change in flushed dnode, which
> will cause heavy cost, so let's just use simple fix by forbidding SSR
> overwrite directly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/segment.c | 8 +++++---
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> index 9d9d9a050d59..69b3b553ee6b 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> @@ -2205,9 +2205,11 @@ static void update_sit_entry(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, block_t blkaddr, int del)
> if (!f2fs_test_and_set_bit(offset, se->discard_map))
> sbi->discard_blks--;
>
> - /* don't overwrite by SSR to keep node chain */
> - if (IS_NODESEG(se->type) &&
> - !is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_CP_DISABLED)) {
> + /*
> + * SSR should never reuse block which is checkpointed
> + * or newly invalidated.
> + */
> + if (!is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_CP_DISABLED)) {
> if (!f2fs_test_and_set_bit(offset, se->ckpt_valid_map))
> se->ckpt_valid_blocks++;
> }
> --
FYI, this commit caused xfstests generic/064 to start failing:
$ kvm-xfstests -c f2fs generic/064
...
generic/064 3s ... [13:36:37][ 5.946293] run fstests generic/064 at 2019-09-26 13:36:37
[13:36:41]- output mismatch (see /results/f2fs/results-default/generic/064.out.bad)
--- tests/generic/064.out 2019-09-18 04:53:46.000000000 -0700
+++ /results/f2fs/results-default/generic/064.out.bad 2019-09-26 13:36:41.533018683 -0700
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
QA output created by 064
Extent count after inserts is in range
+extents mismatched before = 1 after = 50
...
(Run 'diff -u /root/xfstests/tests/generic/064.out /results/f2fs/results-default/generic/064.out.bad' to see the entire diff)
Ran: generic/064
Failures: generic/064
Failed 1 of 1 tests
Powered by blists - more mailing lists