linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RT 4/8] sched: migrate disable: Protect cpus

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190927121954.3gbzk3i3jbpugrjo@linutronix.de>
Date:   Fri, 27 Sep 2019 14:19:54 +0200
From:   Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To:     Scott Wood <swood@...hat.com>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
        Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RT 4/8] sched: migrate disable: Protect cpus_ptr with lock

On 2019-09-26 11:52:42 [-0500], Scott Wood wrote:
> Looks good, thanks!

Thanks, just released.
Moving forward. It would be nice to have some DL-dev feedback on DL
patch. For the remaining once, could please throw Steven's
stress-test-hostplug-cpu-script? If that one does not complain I don't
see a reason why not apply the patches (since they improve performance
and do not break anything while doing so).

> -Scott

Sebastian