[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190927152747.GA10545@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 18:28:04 +0300
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
linux-integrity <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Jones <pjones@...hat.com>,
linux-efi <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>, Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...gle.com>,
Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>,
Bartosz Szczepanek <bsz@...ihalf.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] efi+tpm: Don't access event->count when it isn't
mapped.
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 08:16:16AM -0700, Jerry Snitselaar wrote:
> On Wed Sep 25 19, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 12:25:05PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > > On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 at 12:16, Jarkko Sakkinen
> > > <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > From: Peter Jones <pjones@...hat.com>
> > > >
> > > > Some machines generate a lot of event log entries. When we're
> > > > iterating over them, the code removes the old mapping and adds a
> > > > new one, so once we cross the page boundary we're unmapping the page
> > > > with the count on it. Hilarity ensues.
> > > >
> > > > This patch keeps the info from the header in local variables so we don't
> > > > need to access that page again or keep track of if it's mapped.
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: 44038bc514a2 ("tpm: Abstract crypto agile event size calculations")
> > > > Cc: linux-efi@...r.kernel.org
> > > > Cc: linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org
> > > > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> > > > Signed-off-by: Peter Jones <pjones@...hat.com>
> > > > Tested-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
> > > > Acked-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...gle.com>
> > > > Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
> > >
> > > Thanks Jarkko.
> > >
> > > Shall I take these through the EFI tree?
> >
> > Would be great, if you could because I already sent one PR with fixes for
> > v5.4-rc1 yesterday.
> >
> > /Jarkko
>
> My patch collides with this, so I will submit a v3 that applies on top of
> these once I've run a test with all 3 applied on this t480s.
Great, thanks.
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists