[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <02e4032a-d5f4-abfc-1d71-6a8d50554e40@web.de>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 18:09:09 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Navid Emamdoost <navid.emamdoost@...il.com>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org
Cc: Navid Emamdoost <emamd001@....edu>, Kangjie Lu <kjlu@....edu>,
Stephen A McCamant <smccaman@....edu>,
Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Nishka Dasgupta <nishkadg.linux@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8192u: fix multiple memory leaks on error
path
> In rtl8192_tx on error handling path allocated urbs and also skb should
> be released.
Can this change description be improved?
How do you think about to add the tag “Fixes” here?
> @@ -1588,7 +1590,12 @@ short rtl8192_tx(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb)
> RT_TRACE(COMP_ERR, "Error TX URB %d, error %d",
> atomic_read(&priv->tx_pending[tcb_desc->queue_index]),
> status);
> - return -1;
> +
> +error:
> + dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
…
Would an other label be more appropriate according to the Linux coding style?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists