linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] ASoC: Intel: Skylake: prevent memory leak in snd_skl_parse

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190927025526.GD22969@cs-dulles.cs.umn.edu>
Date:   Thu, 26 Sep 2019 21:55:26 -0500
From:   Navid Emamdoost <navid.emamdoost@...il.com>
To:     Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     emamd001@....edu, smccaman@....edu, kjlu@....edu,
        Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@...el.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jie Yang <yang.jie@...ux.intel.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, Enrico Weigelt <info@...ux.net>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ASoC: Intel: Skylake: prevent memory leak in
 snd_skl_parse_uuids

On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 12:05:28PM -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> On 9/25/19 11:19 AM, Navid Emamdoost wrote:
> > In snd_skl_parse_uuids if allocation for module->instance_id fails, the
> > allocated memory for module shoulde be released. I changes the
> > allocation for module to use devm_kzalloc to be resource_managed
> > allocation and avoid the release in error path.
> 
> if you use devm_, don't you need to fix the error path as well then, I see a
> kfree(uuid) in skl_freeup_uuid_list().
> 
> I am not very familiar with this code but the error seems to be that the
> list_add_tail() is called after the module->instance_id is allocated, so
> there is a risk that the module allocated earlier is not freed (since it's
> not yet added to the list). Freeing the module as done in patch 1 works,
> using devm_ without fixing the error path does not seem correct to me.
> 
Thanks for the feedback, then it's your call if you can accept patch 1 as
fix.

Navid.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Navid Emamdoost <navid.emamdoost@...il.com>
> > ---
> > Changes in v2:
> > 	- Changed the allocation for module from kzalloc to devm_kzalloc
> > ---
> >   sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl-sst-utils.c | 2 +-
> >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl-sst-utils.c b/sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl-sst-utils.c
> > index d43cbf4a71ef..ac37f04b0eea 100644
> > --- a/sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl-sst-utils.c
> > +++ b/sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl-sst-utils.c
> > @@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ int snd_skl_parse_uuids(struct sst_dsp *ctx, const struct firmware *fw,
> >   	 */
> >   	for (i = 0; i < num_entry; i++, mod_entry++) {
> > -		module = kzalloc(sizeof(*module), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +		module = devm_kzalloc(ctx->dev, sizeof(*module), GFP_KERNEL);
> >   		if (!module) {
> >   			ret = -ENOMEM;
> >   			goto free_uuid_list;
> > 
>