[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7689df508569921295851c83bbb6f5fcd2e3f90f.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 15:57:28 -0400
From: Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Thermal management updates for v5.4-rc1
On Fri, 2019-09-27 at 21:52 +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 9:30 PM Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
> wrote:
> > Because there are literally thousands of developers working on
> > kernel
> > bits here and there, and you're swatting this particular fly one
> > developer at a time.
>
> I strongly disagree. One of the golden rules of kernel development is,
> read what Linus writes. Especially during the merge window.
>
> Thanks,
> //richard
Developers come and go. Your argument is temporally flawed. A
developer might start working on the tree, read everything during a
merge window, and not catch one of Linus' rebase rants prior to
committing a rebase felony of their own.
Besides, I don't think this rule of yours is all that universal. If
Linus is off on a thread about arm64 device tree brokenness and someone
does a rebase and he rants about it, I'm very likely to miss that rant.
I read what I reasonably deem to be relevant to me and my work, or
sometimes additional stuff that just jumps out at me. But I never
learned to speed read so I don't even try to read it all and wouldn't
agree to a rule that says I have to.
--
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists