lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9465df76-0229-1b44-5646-5cced1bc1718@nvidia.com>
Date:   Thu, 26 Sep 2019 20:26:46 -0700
From:   John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
To:     "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
        Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>
CC:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        "Namhyung Kim" <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
        Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        "Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        "Matthew Wilcox" <willy@...radead.org>,
        Lance Roy <ldr709@...il.com>,
        Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@...dia.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
        Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>,
        Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@...are.com>,
        "Souptick Joarder" <jrdr.linux@...il.com>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
        Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
        Aaron Lu <ziqian.lzq@...fin.com>,
        Omar Sandoval <osandov@...com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "Vineeth Remanan Pillai" <vpillai@...italocean.com>,
        Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Joel Fernandes" <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...ux.intel.com>,
        Pavel Tatashin <pavel.tatashin@...rosoft.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        "Juergen Gross" <jgross@...e.com>,
        Anthony Yznaga <anthony.yznaga@...cle.com>,
        "Johannes Weiner" <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        "Darrick J . Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] mm: don't expose non-hugetlb page to fast gup
 prematurely

On 9/26/19 3:20 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 04:26:54PM -0600, Yu Zhao wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 10:25:30AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 05:24:58PM -0600, Yu Zhao wrote:
...
>>> I'm thinking this patch make stuff rather fragile.. Should we instead
>>> stick the barrier in set_p*d_at() instead? Or rather, make that store a
>>> store-release?
>>
>> I prefer it this way too, but I suspected the majority would be
>> concerned with the performance implications, especially those
>> looping set_pte_at()s in mm/huge_memory.c.
> 
> We can rename current set_pte_at() to __set_pte_at() or something and
> leave it in places where barrier is not needed. The new set_pte_at()( will
> be used in the rest of the places with the barrier inside.

+1, sounds nice. I was unhappy about the wide-ranging changes that would have
to be maintained. So this seems much better.

> 
> BTW, have you looked at other levels of page table hierarchy. Do we have
> the same issue for PMD/PUD/... pages?
> 

Along the lines of "what other memory barriers might be missing for
get_user_pages_fast(), I'm also concerned that the synchronization between
get_user_pages_fast() and freeing the page tables might be technically broken,
due to missing memory barriers on the get_user_pages_fast() side. Details:

gup_fast() disables interrupts, but I think it also needs some sort of
memory barrier(s), in order to prevent reads of the page table (gup_pgd_range,
etc) from speculatively happening before the interrupts are disabled. 

Leonardo Bras's recent patchset brought this to my attention. Here, he's
recommending adding atomic counting inc/dec before and after the gup_fast()
irq disable/enable points:

   https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190920195047.7703-4-leonardo@linux.ibm.com

...and that lead to noticing a general lack of barriers there.

thanks,
-- 
John Hubbard
NVIDIA

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ