linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 00/11] Introduces new count-based method for monitoring lockless pagetable walks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 27 Sep 2019 20:25:15 -0300
From:   Leonardo Bras <leonardo@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     jhubbard@...dia.com, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc:     benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org, mpe@...erman.id.au,
        arnd@...db.de, aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com, christophe.leroy@....fr,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
        npiggin@...il.com, mahesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
        ganeshgr@...ux.ibm.com, allison@...utok.net, rppt@...ux.ibm.com,
        yuehaibing@...wei.com, ira.weiny@...el.com, jgg@...pe.ca,
        keith.busch@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/11] Introduces new count-based method for
 monitoring lockless pagetable walks

On Fri, 2019-09-27 at 11:46 -0300, Leonardo Bras wrote:
> I am not sure if it would be ok to use irq_{save,restore} in real mode,
> I will do some more reading of the docs before addressing this. 

It looks like it's unsafe to merge irq_{save,restore} in
{start,end}_lockless_pgtbl_walk(), due to a possible access of code
that is not accessible in real mode.

I am sending a v4 for the changes so far.
I will look forward for your feedback.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)