[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f99ca43d-1ba2-95fb-b90f-6706a06f8ce6@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2019 22:21:48 +0200
From: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com,
joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com, rodrigo.vivi@...el.com,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
mingo@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make is_signed_type() simpler
On 29/09/2019 22.06, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> * Simply compare -1 with 0,
> * Drop unnecessary parenthesis sets
>
> -#define is_signed_type(type) (((type)(-1)) < (type)1)
> +#define is_signed_type(type) ((type)-1 < 0)
NAK. I wrote it that way to avoid -Wtautological-compare when type is
unsigned.
Rasmus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists