[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <35e25398-81de-3755-7979-72638a119c77@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2019 15:01:49 +0200
From: Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>
To: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>, pavel@....cz
Cc: linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 13/15] leds: lp55xx: Update the lp55xx to use the multi
color framework
Dan,
On 9/26/19 2:02 PM, Dan Murphy wrote:
> Jacek
>
> On 9/25/19 5:00 PM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
>> Dan,
>>
>> On 9/25/19 7:46 PM, Dan Murphy wrote:
>>> Update the lp5523 to allow the use of the multi color framework.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/leds/Kconfig | 1 +
>>> drivers/leds/leds-lp5523.c | 13 ++
>>> drivers/leds/leds-lp55xx-common.c | 150 ++++++++++++++++++----
>>> drivers/leds/leds-lp55xx-common.h | 11 ++
>>> include/linux/platform_data/leds-lp55xx.h | 6 +
>>> 5 files changed, 157 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/leds/Kconfig b/drivers/leds/Kconfig
>>> index 84f60e35c5ee..dc3d9f2194cd 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/leds/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/drivers/leds/Kconfig
>>> @@ -377,6 +377,7 @@ config LEDS_LP50XX
>>> config LEDS_LP55XX_COMMON
>>> tristate "Common Driver for TI/National
>>> LP5521/5523/55231/5562/8501"
>>> depends on LEDS_LP5521 || LEDS_LP5523 || LEDS_LP5562 ||
>>> LEDS_LP8501
>>> + depends on LEDS_CLASS_MULTI_COLOR && OF
>>> select FW_LOADER
>>> select FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER
>>> help
>>> diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-lp5523.c b/drivers/leds/leds-lp5523.c
>>> index d0b931a136b9..8b2cdb98fed6 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/leds/leds-lp5523.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-lp5523.c
>>> @@ -791,6 +791,18 @@ static ssize_t store_master_fader_leds(struct
>>> device *dev,
>>> return ret;
>>> }
>>> +static int lp5523_led_intensity(struct lp55xx_led *led, int chan_num)
>> Why do we need this function? brightness op will not suffice?
>
> I looked at this before sending it in. This API adds the chan_num to
> write to.
>
> The brightness_fn does not it takes it from the led structure.
>
>>
>>> +{
>>> + struct lp55xx_chip *chip = led->chip;
>>> + int ret;
>>> +
>>> + mutex_lock(&chip->lock);
>>> + ret = lp55xx_write(chip, LP5523_REG_LED_PWM_BASE + chan_num,
>>> + led->brightness);
>>> + mutex_unlock(&chip->lock);
>>> + return ret;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> static int lp5523_led_brightness(struct lp55xx_led *led)
>>> {
>>> struct lp55xx_chip *chip = led->chip;
>>> @@ -857,6 +869,7 @@ static struct lp55xx_device_config lp5523_cfg = {
>>> .max_channel = LP5523_MAX_LEDS,
>>> .post_init_device = lp5523_post_init_device,
>>> .brightness_fn = lp5523_led_brightness,
>>> + .color_intensity_fn = lp5523_led_intensity,
>>> .set_led_current = lp5523_set_led_current,
>>> .firmware_cb = lp5523_firmware_loaded,
>>> .run_engine = lp5523_run_engine,
>>> diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-lp55xx-common.c
>>> b/drivers/leds/leds-lp55xx-common.c
>>> index 44ced02b49f9..0e4b3a9d3047 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/leds/leds-lp55xx-common.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-lp55xx-common.c
>>> @@ -136,9 +136,26 @@ static int lp55xx_set_brightness(struct
>>> led_classdev *cdev,
>>> {
>>> struct lp55xx_led *led = cdev_to_lp55xx_led(cdev);
>>> struct lp55xx_device_config *cfg = led->chip->cfg;
>>> + int brightness_val[LP55XX_MAX_GROUPED_CHAN];
>>> + int ret;
>>> + int i;
>>> +
>>> + if (led->mc_cdev.num_leds > 1) {
>>> + led_mc_calc_brightness(&led->mc_cdev,
>>> + brightness, brightness_val);
>>> + for (i = 0; i < led->mc_cdev.num_leds; i++) {
>>> + led->brightness = brightness_val[i];
>>> + ret = cfg->color_intensity_fn(led,
>>> + led->grouped_channels[i]);
>> Now we will have three separate calls for each color component
>> (and possibly sleeping on mutex on contention).
>>
>> Probably LED mc class use case will need a bit different design.
>>
>> Also, instead of grouped_channels we could possibly have
>>
>> led_mc_get_color_id(&led->mc_dev, i)
> color_id and grouped_channels are not a 1:1 mapping
OK, they're channel numbers.
>> which would map entry position index to color_id.
>>
>> I will stop reviewing here and will continue after taking
>> deeper look at this lp55xx design.
I've analyzed that design in greater detail and have started
to wonder why you can't pass two arrays to the new op:
channel numbers and corresponding calculated channel intensities?
--
Best regards,
Jacek Anaszewski
Powered by blists - more mailing lists