[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190930103626.de3p6rbowyerjbks@DESKTOP-E1NTVVP.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 10:36:27 +0000
From: Brian Starkey <Brian.Starkey@....com>
To: "james qian wang (Arm Technology China)" <james.qian.wang@....com>
CC: "Lowry Li (Arm Technology China)" <Lowry.Li@....com>,
Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>,
"maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com"
<maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
"seanpaul@...omium.org" <seanpaul@...omium.org>,
"airlied@...ux.ie" <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Mihail Atanassov <Mihail.Atanassov@....com>,
"Julien Yin (Arm Technology China)" <Julien.Yin@....com>,
"Jonathan Chai (Arm Technology China)" <Jonathan.Chai@....com>,
Ayan Halder <Ayan.Halder@....com>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
nd <nd@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/komeda: Adds output-color format/depth support
On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 02:22:24AM +0000, james qian wang (Arm Technology China) wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 09:48:11AM +0000, Brian Starkey wrote:
> > Hi James,
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 02:13:27AM +0000, james qian wang (Arm Technology China) wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Brian:
> > >
> > > Since one monitor can support mutiple color-formats, this DT property
> > > supply a way for user to select a specific one from this supported
> > > color-formats.
> >
> > Modifying DT is a _really_ user-unfriendly way of specifying
> > preferences. If we want a user to be able to pick a preferred format,
> > then it should probably be via the atomic API as Ville mentioned.
> >
>
> Hi Brian:
>
> Agree, a drm UPAI might be the best & right way for this.
>
> I can raise a new thread/topic to discuss the "HOW TO", maybe after the
> Chinese national day.
>
> LAST:
> what do you think about this patch:
> - Just drop it, waiting for the new uapi
> - or keep it, and replace it once new uapi is ready.
The bit-depth stuff is clear and non-controversial, so you could split
that out and merge it.
For the YUV stuff, I think it would be fine to merge the
implementation that we discussed here - force YUV for modes which must
be YUV, and leave the user-preference stuff for a later UAPI.
Thanks,
-Brian
>
> Thanks
> James
>
> > Cheers,
> > -Brian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists